Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.7 to 5.7, and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.3325 vs $0.78 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 26 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
62.4
Output $/M
$0.78
26
Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.3325
0
vs boards won of 26 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $0.78 per million).

Shared results
26
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
75
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 66.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1501 against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 1017, 80.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.78 against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashBarsLlama 3.2 3B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning40
Math20
Knowledge40
General130
All shared boards260
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1618Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
SciCode51.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierCode43.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1092.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding15021098DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14961103DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1628Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1612Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1606Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.75.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index155.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic40.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured21.1%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
APEX-Agents39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BALROGNot measured10.1%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured21.9%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
LiveBench reasoning86.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.5%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.2%5.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI94.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14831095DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15011090DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14881141DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1297Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1307Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured3.3Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 367.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math14781126DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14851128DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.7%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14691106DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14841104DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14431115DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14611074DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1309Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1315Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1290Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1356Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1320Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1244Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench design79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured26.2%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%4.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench89.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMCA47.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text14641110DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14731089DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14371094DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14731180DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14491019DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15011017DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: German14701056DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1465Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1467949DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14611105DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14731100DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14501096DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14451083DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: English1288Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1327Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1282Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1260Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1275Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.013Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.050Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMeta Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026September 25, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.21$0.0505
Output $/Mtok$0.78$0.3325
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $0.78 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.21 per million input tokens and $0.78 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 and $0.3325. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next