DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads GLM 4.7 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.7 to 14.9, and GLM 4.7 Flash costs 2.1x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.84 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 39 shared
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 4.7 Flash: which to pick
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.84 per million).
Model ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek62.5/1005 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BGLM 4.7 FlashZ.aiNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
- Shared results
- 39
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
- 62
- GLM 4.7 Flash only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads, 24.7 against 14.9.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads, 1308 against 1194.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 4.7 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.0006, GLM 4.7 Flash $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks, GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 26.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 84.0% against GLM 4.7 Flash 41.7%, 42.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.84 against GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GLM 4.7 Flash 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Bars | GLM 4.7 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 7 | 0 | ||
| General | 17 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 39 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 90.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 19.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 84.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 45.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 40.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 74.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 46.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 16.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 69.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 73.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SciCode | 51.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 22.0% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| FrontierCode | 43.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1092.3 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1502 | 1382 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1496 | 1389 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1628 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1612 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1606 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 24.7 | 14.9 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.9 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench research | 86.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LiveBench browser | 84.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 40.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 0.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 53.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 26.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 41.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 57.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Vals Science Index | 29.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 98.8% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| APEX-Agents | 39.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 86.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 21.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 58.1% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.2% | 7.6% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 89.8% | 60.5% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| ARC-AGI | 94.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Chess puzzles | 48.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 43.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1483 | 1356 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1501 | 1357 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1488 | 1369 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1297 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1307 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.3% | 58.3% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 67.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| ProofBench | 54.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1478 | 1355 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1485 | 1369 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 41.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 42.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1469 | 1358 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1484 | 1343 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1443 | 1357 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1461 | 1343 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1308 | 1194 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1312 | 1205 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1330 | 1134 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1291 | 1123 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1355 | 1120 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1320 | 1177 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1245 | 1037 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1265 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LiveBench design | 79.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 79.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 64.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 47.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 85.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 60.8% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 84.0% | 41.7% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| DTBench | 89.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMCA | 47.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Furniture assembly | 34.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1464 | 1351 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1473 | 1327 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1437 | 1296 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1278 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1473 | 1373 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1449 | 1330 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1501 | 1403 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1470 | 1336 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1432 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1436 | 1283 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1465 | 1332 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1459 | 1350 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1467 | 1333 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1457 | 1291 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1461 | 1342 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1473 | 1345 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1450 | 1320 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1445 | 1304 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1288 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1327 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1282 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1260 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1275 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.014Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.053Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window
GLM 4.7 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Z.ai GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | September 10, 2026 | January 19, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.2225 | $0.0653 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.84 | $0.40 |
| Coding index | 62.5 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than GLM 4.7 Flash for coding?
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.84 per million).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 4.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.2225 per million input tokens and $0.84 per million output tokens; GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 4.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash comparison based on?
39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GLM 4.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.