Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 12 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
39.5
Output $/M
$0.60
12
Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
19.5
Output $/M
$1.15
0
vs boards won of 12 shared

Decision reading

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
12
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
27
Step 3.7 Flash only
6
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Step 3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 21.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1622.0 against Step 3.7 Flash 694.1, 30.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Step 3.7 Flash $1.15 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Step 3.7 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsStep 3.7 FlashTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Web design70
General10
All shared boards120
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured39.6Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%43.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.6%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1622.0694.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.519.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1230Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.5%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%21.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites13121196DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13001179DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13621158DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13351172DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13721129DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13341182DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1085Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12431152DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
IFBenchNot measured67.3%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%73.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.0008Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.013Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.051Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Step 3.7 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
MakerDeepSeekStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026May 28, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.20
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.15
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Step 3.7 Flash for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Step 3.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20 and $1.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Step 3.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Step 3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next