Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3 Super

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 1.3x less per output token ($0.45 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
5
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.45 vs $0.60 per million).

Shared results
5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
34
Nemotron 3 Super only
34
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 33.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1622.0 against Nemotron 3 Super 213.9, 46.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%36.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-Bench1622.0213.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1409Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.512.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1259Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured67.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%20.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1386Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1380Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1387Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1392Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1364Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1310Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1352Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1363Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
IFBenchNot measured71.5%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%65.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena TextNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1347Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1400Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1431Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1369Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1362Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1332Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerDeepSeekNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026March 11, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.085
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.45
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.45 vs $0.60 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nemotron 3 Super?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nemotron 3 Super?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next