Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 2

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Mercury 2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 10.8, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 1.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $0.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
15
Mercury 2Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
0
vs boards won of 15 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Mercury 2: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
15
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
24
Mercury 2 only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Mercury 2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 50.5 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1667 against Mercury 2 1160, 73.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Mercury 2 $0.75 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Mercury 2 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsMercury 2Ties
Coding50
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Web design70
General10
All shared boards150
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev16641171DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured31.1Only Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%37.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.5%Only Mercury 2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.2%Only Mercury 2 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0785.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1390Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1385Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671160DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871199DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.510.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.6Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1245Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured70.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.0%Only Mercury 2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%17.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1362Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1358Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1374Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1343Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1363Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1349Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
Design Arena: websites13111036DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components1303996DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev1357984DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301009DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D1358982DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13321021DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured998Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1242988DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
IFBenchNot measured69.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%43.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena TextNot measured1354Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1328Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1286Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1378Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1330Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1414Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1304Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1357Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1329Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1300Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1314Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 2
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Inception Mercury 2
MakerDeepSeekInception
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026March 4, 2026
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.75
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Mercury 2 for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Mercury 2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Mercury 2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 2 comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Mercury 2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next