Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads GLM 4.7 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 14.9, and GLM 4.7 Flash costs 1.5x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
11
GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
42.1
Output $/M
$0.40
0
vs boards won of 11 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 4.7 Flash: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.60 per million).

Shared results
11
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
28
GLM 4.7 Flash only
32
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 41.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 99.4% against GLM 4.7 Flash 58.3%, 41.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, GLM 4.7 Flash 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGLM 4.7 FlashTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
Math10
Web design60
General10
All shared boards110
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured22.0%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1382Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1389Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.514.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1230Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.8%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.1%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%7.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%60.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1356Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1357Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1369Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%58.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1355Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1369Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1358Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1343Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1357Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1343Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites13121194DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13001208DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13621135DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13351123DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13721121DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13341178DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1038Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1243Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
IFBenchNot measured60.8%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%41.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena TextNot measured1351Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1327Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1296Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1373Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1330Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1403Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1336Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1283Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1332Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1350Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1333Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1291Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1342Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1345Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1320Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1304Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 4.7 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Z.ai GLM 4.7 Flash
MakerDeepSeekZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026January 19, 2026
Context window1.05M200K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.0653
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.40
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than GLM 4.7 Flash for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.60 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 4.7 Flash comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GLM 4.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next