Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Devstral 2 2512

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Devstral 2 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 8.6, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 3.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
1
Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Devstral 2 2512: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Devstral 2 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
38
Devstral 2 2512 only
5
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 30.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 39.5 against Devstral 2 2512 8.6, 30.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Devstral 2 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsDevstral 2 2512Ties
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured53.8%Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured31.3Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.8%Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured62.8%Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.58.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured2.3Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1230Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites1312Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1300Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1362Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1335Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1334Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1243Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Devstral 2 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Devstral 2 2512
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mistral Devstral 2 2512
MakerDeepSeekMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026December 9, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.00
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.19
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Devstral 2 2512 for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Devstral 2 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Devstral 2 2512?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Devstral 2 2512?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Devstral 2 2512 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Devstral 2 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next