LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3

Updated October 21, 2026. 44 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
55.0
Overall
16.6
Output $/M
$0.41
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
79.7
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
44
vs boards won of 44 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.0 for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp when output tokens cost 10.4x less.

Shared results
44
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
13
Muse Spark 1.3 only
48
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 55.0 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 33.1 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 1272 against Muse Spark 1.3 1659, 55.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 10.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design07
General020
All shared boards044
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev12721659Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14381510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14381511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811653Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.648.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9157.2Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1217Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1244Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1048Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert14221519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: math14221497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: science14431507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14191499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14121490Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites11791356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components11661352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev11451329Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz11521343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D11481359Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories11711353Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG10311300Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1280Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench87.7%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA29.1%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14011479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14041462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14411495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14041481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14611532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German14401513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese13311470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean13721490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French14341511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish14411496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian14121491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish14351490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14181488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14071470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025September 2, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.41$4.25
Coding index55.079.7
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.0 for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp when output tokens cost 10.4x less.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Muse Spark 1.3?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v3-2-exp-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3" title="DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-exp-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3</a></p>