Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark 1.1

Updated October 21, 2026. 44 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
55.0
Overall
16.6
Output $/M
$0.41
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
48.9
Overall
33.7
Output $/M
$4.25
44
vs boards won of 44 shared

Decision reading

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for coding: it scores 55.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
44
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
13
Muse Spark 1.1 only
52
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 55.0 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 48.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 25.4 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 1281 against Muse Spark 1.1 1540, 43.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 10.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design07
General020
All shared boards044
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev12721542Muse Spark 1.1
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding14381498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14381498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811540Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.633.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1177Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1184Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1194Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1156Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured974Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert14221478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14221482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14431484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14191481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14121470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites11791270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components11661290Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev11451269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz11521268Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3D11481260Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories11711276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVG10311234Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench87.7%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA29.1%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14011457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14041435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English14411478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English14041471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14611515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German14401469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13311450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean13721459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French14341492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14411464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian14121482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish14351499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14181462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14071448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.41$4.25
Coding index55.048.9
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for coding: it scores 55.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1. Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Muse Spark 1.1?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next