Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 Mini leads DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 14.8, and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 4.4x less per output token ($1.0142 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0142
16
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
35.8
Overall
44.0
Output $/M
$4.50
18
vs boards won of 34 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or GPT-5.4 Mini: which to pick

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $4.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: hard prompts or LMArena Text: hard prompts in English, where it leads.

Shared results
34
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus only
11
GPT-5.4 Mini only
55
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 28.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 37.1% against GPT-5.4 Mini 83.3%, 46.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, GPT-5.4 Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusBarsGPT-5.4 MiniTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning32
Math01
Knowledge31
General105
All shared boards1618
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1397Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
AA Coding Index43.556.1GPT-5.4 Mini
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.5%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured73.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured2.5%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SciCode38.0%52.1%GPT-5.4 Mini
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.8%52.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
FrontierCodeNot measured27.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench745.21188.6GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: coding14251438GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: software and IT14261436GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1419Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.824.1GPT-5.4 Mini
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured148.7Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
AA Agentic Index6.817.9GPT-5.4 Mini
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured45.4%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured12.5%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured45.4%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
τ²-Bench Telecom37.1%83.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
DeepResearch BenchNot measured36.3%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured83.1%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%87.5%GPT-5.4 Mini
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.4%28.1%GPT-5.4 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured63.7%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured18.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured23.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured11.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261424DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1435Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14321420DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1285Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%37.9%DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured95.6%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
AA Math Index89.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured51.2%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured9.8%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured21.0%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math14021418GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1429Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured84.5%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.9%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured63.5%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured29.4%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science14511417DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681395DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: legal and government14571414DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: business and finance14141418GPT-5.4 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites1187Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: UI components1182Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: 3D1141Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: SVG1065Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index105
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured50.8%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured54.2%Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench57.0%73.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%77.0%GPT-5.4 Mini
DTBench81.3%80.0%DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMCA28.6%40.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text14191412DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: instruction following14041405GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: creative writing14031370DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena VisionNot measured1245Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English14291412DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: non-English14081405DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1446Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1375Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1370Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1441Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1405Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian14351417DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: Polish14271415DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: multi-turn14111429GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: longer queries14221408DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: writing and language14091393DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13911373DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1244Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1286Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1218Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1222Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.4 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.0008Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.018Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.071Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GPT-5.4 Mini
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusOpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2025March 17, 2026
Context window164K400K
Input $/Mtok$0.3063$0.75
Output $/Mtok$1.0142$4.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked35.8
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.70
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than GPT-5.4 Mini for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $4.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: hard prompts or LMArena Text: hard prompts in English, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or GPT-5.4 Mini?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 and $4.50. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or GPT-5.4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 Mini, with 400K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs GPT-5.4 Mini comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Mini's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next