Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.6 to 14.8, and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 1.5x less per output token ($1.0142 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0142
25
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
6
vs boards won of 31 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
31
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus only
14
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
48
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 11.7 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: data viz: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 1168 against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1045, 15.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusBarsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewTies
Coding31
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math01
Knowledge40
Web design70
General83
All shared boards256
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1257Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Coding Index43.534.7DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured62.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured34.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SciCode38.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
ALE-Bench745.2797.7Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: coding14251400DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: software and IT14261413DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1245Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1276Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1336Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.815.6Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index6.81.6DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured30.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured3.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured3.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom37.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured81.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured82.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261407DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14321403DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1242Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1271Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AIMENot measured83.3%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Math Index89.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: math14021428Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1417Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
MMLU ProNot measured86.2%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured55.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: science14511425DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681428DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: legal and government14571418DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: business and finance14141389DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured51.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites11871082DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Design Arena: UI components11821069DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Design Arena: game dev11311029DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Design Arena: data viz11681045DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Design Arena: 3D11411047DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Design Arena: all code categories11751072DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Design Arena: SVG10651052DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1167Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index83
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured63.9%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured41.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IFBench57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
DTBench81.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMCA28.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text14191416DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: instruction following14041377DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: creative writing14031401DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena VisionNot measured1240Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: English14291414DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: non-English14081410Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1460Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1430Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1413Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1392Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1424Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1421Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian14351420DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: Polish14271443Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn14111417Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries14221394DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: writing and language14091408DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13911386DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1232Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1278Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1246Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1266Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1259Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1248Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.0008Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.018Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.071Exceeds the context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2025March 3, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.3063$0.25
Output $/Mtok$1.0142$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked22.7
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.18
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next