R1 0528 vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus leads R1 0528 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 27.0 to 13.1, at about the same output price ($1.95 vs $2.18 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 45 benchmarks have a result for both.
R1 0528 or Qwen3.6 Plus: which to pick
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a coding score, 44.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; R1 0528 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick R1 0528 for work measured by ALE-Bench or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 45
- R1 0528 only
- 15
- Qwen3.6 Plus only
- 38
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus leads, 27.0 against 13.1.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a GPQA Diamond result, 87.4%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a AIME result, 94.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a MMLU Pro result, 87.7%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus leads, 1243 against 1149.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus takes 1M tokens against 164K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus
R1 0528 $0.0016, Qwen3.6 Plus $0.0013 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has the number, $1.19.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- R1 0528 not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 Plus 44.1 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 61.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: R1 0528 36.5% against Qwen3.6 Plus 97.7%, 61.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- R1 0528 $2.18 against Qwen3.6 Plus $1.95 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
- Context window
- R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.6 Plus 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | R1 0528 | Bars | Qwen3.6 Plus | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 3 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 7 | ||
| General | 2 | 17 | ||
| All shared boards | 4 | 41 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 71.4% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1461 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 54.5 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.0% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.4% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 25.6% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.1% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.2% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 77.0% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 15.9% | 43.9% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| WeirdML | 41.6% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 804.1 | 670.1 | R1 0528 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1427 | 1467 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1435 | 1462 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1454 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1463 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1472 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 13.1 | 27.0 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 147.3 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.9% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.7% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.9% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.9% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 36.5% | 97.7% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| METR time horizons | 53.8% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 35.1% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $5,115 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | 16.4% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 87.4% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.2% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 81.3% | 88.2% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 15.8% | 27.8% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 76.3% | 88.4% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| ARC-AGI | 21.2% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.1% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| SimpleBench | 40.8% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 14.0% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 12.0% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1415 | 1448 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1394 | 1454 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1422 | 1455 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 94.6% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| AA Math Index | 76.0 | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.0% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 66.4% | 93.3% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 38.2% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| MATH level 5 | 96.6% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1400 | 1449 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1415 | 1448 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 87.7% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.2% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.5% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.9% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.7% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.0% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 36.9% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.9% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 44.1% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1430 | 1439 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1445 | 1442 | R1 0528 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1419 | 1437 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1402 | 1430 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1149 | 1243 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1100 | 1230 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1097 | 1211 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1182 | 1228 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1110 | 1202 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1138 | 1236 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1038 | 1161 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1113 | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index217
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.9% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.0% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 51.5% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| IFBench | 39.6% | 75.2% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 55.7% | 78.3% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| DTBench | Not measured | 81.9% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 33.1% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 75.0% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 81.9% | Not measured | Only R1 0528 measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 20.3% | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1436 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1382 | 1424 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1405 | 1404 | R1 0528 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1437 | 1445 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1412 | 1424 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1442 | 1477 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: German | 1404 | 1451 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1391 | 1390 | R1 0528 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1360 | 1379 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: French | 1417 | 1455 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1411 | 1432 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1423 | 1434 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1428 | 1433 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1405 | 1438 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1391 | 1439 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1402 | 1418 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1400 | 1402 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek R1 0528 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | May 28, 2025 | April 2, 2026 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.50 | $0.325 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.18 | $1.95 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 44.1 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.19 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is R1 0528 better than Qwen3.6 Plus for coding?
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a coding score, 44.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; R1 0528 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick R1 0528 for work measured by ALE-Bench or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.18 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.325 and $1.95. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.6 Plus only.
Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus, with 1M tokens against 164K.
How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Qwen3.6 Plus comparison based on?
45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 Plus's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.