Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 leads R1 0528 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.4 to 13.1, and R1 0528 costs 1.9x less per output token ($2.18 vs $4.18 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
46.8
Output $/M
$2.18
6
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
56.4
Overall
54.6
Output $/M
$4.18
32
vs boards won of 38 shared

R1 0528 or Mistral Large 4: which to pick

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; R1 0528 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick R1 0528 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($2.18 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: creative writing, where it leads.

Shared results
38
R1 0528 only
22
Mistral Large 4 only
43
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 not benchmarked, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 25.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: R1 0528 66.4% against Mistral Large 4 98.3%, 31.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.18 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math03
Knowledge13
Web design07
General510
All shared boards632
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1543Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SciCodeNot measured54.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.11213.2Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: coding14271478Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: software and IT14351467Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1559Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.138.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.0Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
BrowseComp-Plus16.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%88.1%Mistral Large 4
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: expert13941444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221442Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1288Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%98.3%Mistral Large 4
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001469Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151462Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: science14301448Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451433R1 0528
LMArena Text: legal and government14191425Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: business and finance14021439Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websites11491257Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: UI components11001272Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: game dev10971225Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: data viz11821275Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: 3D11101252Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: all code categories11381259Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: SVG10381232Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1202Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index510
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench39.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBenchNot measured88.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMCANot measured35.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text14281431Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: instruction following13821422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: creative writing14051363R1 0528
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: English14371433R1 0528
LMArena Text: non-English14121422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Chinese14421492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: German1404Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13911415Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Korean1360Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: French14171492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Spanish14111455Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Russian14231417R1 0528
LMArena Text: Polish1428Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051435Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: longer queries13911428Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: writing and language14021386R1 0528
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001378R1 0528
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1283Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1284Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkR1 0528Mistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.032Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.122Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528Mistral Large 4
MakerDeepSeekMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 28, 2025October 6, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$1.36
Output $/Mtok$2.18$4.18
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; R1 0528 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick R1 0528 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($2.18 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: creative writing, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Mistral Large 4?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.18 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next