LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 vs MiniMax M3

Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Coding
70.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0287
0
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
57.8
Overall
29.2
Output $/M
$1.20
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

Decision reading

DeepSeek V3 scores 70.2 and MiniMax M3 57.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick DeepSeek V3 when output tokens cost 1.2x less; pick MiniMax M3 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) or OTIS Mock AIME, where it leads.

Shared results
11
DeepSeek V3 only
2
MiniMax M3 only
105
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 70.2 from 1 benchmark, MiniMax M3 57.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 22.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: SVG: DeepSeek V3 976 against MiniMax M3 1161, 23.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 $1.0287 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 takes 164K tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3BarsMiniMax M3Ties
Reasoning01
Math01
Web design07
General02
All shared boards011
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index24 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
Aider polyglot70.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
SWE-bench Lite30.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured70.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1482Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.6Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured640.0Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1466Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1478Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured29.2Only MiniMax M3 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.9Only MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.5Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1164Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1180Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1205Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1021Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured12.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured29.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured88.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured74.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%90.9%MiniMax M3
SimpleBenchNot measured45.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured13.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1268Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME48.9%71.1%MiniMax M3
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1429Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1448Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1452Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1441Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1434Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websites11201257MiniMax M3
Design Arena: UI components10931246MiniMax M3
Design Arena: game dev10541210MiniMax M3
Design Arena: data viz10891235MiniMax M3
Design Arena: 3D10871209MiniMax M3
Design Arena: all code categories11081247MiniMax M3
Design Arena: SVG9761161MiniMax M3
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1161Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured66.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBenchNot measured82.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
DTBench62.7%78.9%MiniMax M3
LMCA15.2%33.7%MiniMax M3
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1404Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1251Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1443Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1420Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1466Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1428Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1380Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1373Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1444Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1426Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1423Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1443Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1446Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1419Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1403Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1263Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1259Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1234Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1435Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.0008Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.016Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.062Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 and MiniMax M3
SpecificationDeepSeek V3MiniMax M3
MakerDeepSeekMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 26, 2024May 31, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.2574$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.0287$1.20
Coding index70.257.8
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

DeepSeek V3 scores 70.2 and MiniMax M3 57.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick DeepSeek V3 when output tokens cost 1.2x less; pick MiniMax M3 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) or OTIS Mock AIME, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or MiniMax M3?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.2574 per million input tokens and $1.0287 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiniMax M3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next