Command A vs MiMo-V2.5
Updated October 21, 2026. 49 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Command A has the edge where what matters is LegalBench (Vals AI) or IFBench, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 49
- Command A only
- 11
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 31
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads, 21.8 against 13.1.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads, 15.8 against 1.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads, 81.6% against 48.5%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Command A has a AIME result, 13.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads, 82.9% against 69.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1266.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 takes 1.05M tokens against 256K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5
Command A $0.0075, MiMo-V2.5 $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5
Command A $2.69, MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Command A not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 31.0 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI): Command A 7.8% against MiMo-V2.5 71.0%, 63.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Command A $10.00 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 29.8x apart.
- Context window
- Command A takes 256K tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Command A | Bars | MiMo-V2.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 8 | ||
| General | 1 | 19 | ||
| All shared boards | 2 | 47 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1438 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 27.8 | 56.8 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 35.1% | 81.5% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 7.8% | 71.0% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 17.6% | 60.7% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.7% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| SciCode | 38.5% | 43.9% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 25.0% | 41.7% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 514.0 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1330 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1336 | 1463 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1425 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1429 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 13.1 | 21.8 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.0 | 15.8 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 9.0% | 36.7% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.8% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.1% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.1% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 80.7% | 90.6% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.5% | 81.6% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.0% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.1% | 84.9% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 12.0% | 27.2% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1326 | 1450 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1296 | 1459 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1335 | 1461 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1269 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1262 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 13.3% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 76.2% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 85.7% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| AA Math Index | 13.0 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.0% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 16.0% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1300 | 1436 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1312 | 1451 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 69.2% | 82.9% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 79.7% | 78.9% | Command A |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 64.5% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 46.0% | 59.9% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 61.4% | 71.8% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.3% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 80.5% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 19.7% | 31.9% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 71.2% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1339 | 1440 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1334 | 1432 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1348 | 1425 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1315 | 1432 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1258 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1249 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1249 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1216 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1260 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1179 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1141 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index119
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.3% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 55.7% | 72.2% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 52.8% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| IFBench | 73.9% | 67.1% | Command A |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 52.7% | 73.0% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMCA | 10.3% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1428 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1309 | 1435 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1319 | 1393 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1247 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1344 | 1447 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1313 | 1405 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1327 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1342 | 1421 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1285 | 1306 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1285 | 1361 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1351 | 1448 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1347 | 1414 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1314 | 1396 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1324 | 1413 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1338 | 1445 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1334 | 1445 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1328 | 1409 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1306 | 1399 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1259 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1326 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1256 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1226 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1189 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1230 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Cohere Command A | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | March 13, 2025 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.50 | $0.168 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $0.336 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 50.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $2.69 | $0.01 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Command A better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?
Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A has the edge where what matters is LegalBench (Vals AI) or IFBench, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2.5?
Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Command A costs $2.69 and MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.
Which has the bigger context window, Command A or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks is the Command A vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?
49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.