Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads Qwen3.6 27B on coding, 57.3 to 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.6 27B costs 5.6x less per output token ($2.70 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.3
Overall
60.3
Output $/M
$15.00
20
Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
4
vs boards won of 24 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B.

Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($2.70 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($1.30 against $1.68).

Shared results
24
Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
99
Qwen3.6 27B only
1
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 17.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Sonnet 4.6 55.8% against Qwen3.6 27B 11.9%, 43.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.6 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.6BarsQwen3.6 27BTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work11
Reasoning40
Math01
Knowledge31
General51
All shared boards204
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
LiveBench coding66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1523Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
AA Coding Index63.053.7Claude Sonnet 4.6
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%70.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)55.8%11.9%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Code migration (Vals AI)39.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SciCode50.1%42.8%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%34.8%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-Bench53.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FrontierCode24.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
WeirdML66.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding1503Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1491Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1512Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1527Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1529Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring32.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index30.121.4Claude Sonnet 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index152.8146.2Claude Sonnet 4.6
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Agentic Index31.818.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: agents building web apps1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1213Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1211Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1196Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1226Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1177Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench research63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser68.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic23.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom79.5%94.2%Qwen3.6 27B
APEX-Agents43.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld 2.09.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld72.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$7,204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MCP Atlas69.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond85.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning86.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%84.2%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%23.1%Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.4%85.9%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ARC-AGI86.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles16.0%7.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1500Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1493Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1306Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1311Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AIME92.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME85.8%91.1%Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured35.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
ProofBench45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1462Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1483Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.0%53.2%Claude Sonnet 4.6
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%62.3%Claude Sonnet 4.6
TaxEval (Vals AI)77.1%71.3%Claude Sonnet 4.6
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.7%68.3%Qwen3.6 27B
MedQA (Vals AI)92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science1474Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1451Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1470Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1464Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite37.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1284Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1269Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1258Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1278Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1275Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1196Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1235Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench design71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)46.6%45.6%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Vals Multimodal Index60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IFBench56.6%67.6%Qwen3.6 27B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%77.3%Claude Sonnet 4.6
DTBench89.9%78.1%Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMCA46.5%34.5%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ExploitBench23.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text1458Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1476Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1435Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision1283Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1472Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1440Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1428Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1420Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1410Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1465Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1464Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1440Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1464Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1479Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1444Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1431Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1298Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1307Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1296Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1248Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1195Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1272Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1482Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
EQ-Bench 412071026Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.6 27B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.6 27B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 17, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.45
Output $/Mtok$15.00$2.70
Coding index57.336.8
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved task$1.68$1.30
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B. Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($2.70 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($1.30 against $1.68).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $1.68 and Qwen3.6 27B $1.30.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-vs-qwen3-6-27b" title="Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.6 27B, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-vs-qwen3-6-27b">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.6 27B</a></p>