Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 30.1 to 21.4, and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs 6.4x less per output token ($2.34 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 62 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.3
Overall
60.3
Output $/M
$15.00
49
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
13
vs boards won of 62 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($2.34 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
62
Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
61
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
4
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 17.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
IFBench: Claude Sonnet 4.6 56.6% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 78.8%, 22.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 6.4x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.6BarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding70
Intelligence20
Agentic work11
Reasoning72
Math21
Knowledge31
Web design70
General208
All shared boards4913
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench coding66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev15231400Claude Sonnet 4.6
AA Coding Index63.0Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)39.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SciCode50.1%44.8%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%40.9%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-Bench53.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FrontierCode24.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
WeirdML66.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured621.9Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding15031464Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT14911463Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React15121388Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: HTML15271410Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: from an image1529Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring32.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index30.121.4Claude Sonnet 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index152.8146.8Claude Sonnet 4.6
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Agentic Index31.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1213Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1211Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1196Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1226Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1177Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench research63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser68.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic23.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom79.5%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-Agents43.0%24.9%Claude Sonnet 4.6
OSWorld 2.09.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld72.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$7,204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MCP Atlas69.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index72
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond85.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning86.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%29.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.4%86.4%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ARC-AGI86.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles16.0%18.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851448Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: expert15001462Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14931450Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams13061277Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: homework13111292Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AIME92.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME85.8%88.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ProofBench45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math14621453Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work14831454Claude Sonnet 4.6
MathArenaNot measured19.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science14741457Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14511455Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: legal and government14701441Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14641435Claude Sonnet 4.6
FACTS Benchmark Suite37.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websites12841190Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: UI components12691161Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: game dev12581140Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: data viz12781175Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: 3D12341160Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: all code categories12751179Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: SVG11961139Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: ASCII art1235Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench design71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index208
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)46.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IFBench56.6%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%77.3%Claude Sonnet 4.6
DTBench89.9%87.5%Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMCA46.5%37.9%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ExploitBench23.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14581437Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following14761424Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing14351402Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision12831262Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: English14721443Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14401430Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese14911498Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: German14281445Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Japanese14201429Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Korean14101384Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: French14651462Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish14641441Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Russian14401430Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish14431447Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: multi-turn14641446Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries14791441Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language14441415Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14311399Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: English12981268Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: Chinese13071314Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: reading text12961271Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: humor12481262Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things11951265Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: creative writing12721260Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Document1482Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
EQ-Bench 41207Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 17, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.39
Output $/Mtok$15.00$2.34
Coding index57.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved task$1.68Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($2.34 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

62 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next