Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads Gemma 4 26B A4B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 30.1 to 16.7, and Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 25.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 53 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.3
Overall
60.3
Output $/M
$15.00
47
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
54.7
Output $/M
$0.60
6
vs boards won of 53 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemma 4 26B A4B: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: math or FACTS Benchmark Suite, where it leads.

Shared results
53
Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
65
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
2
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 32.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Claude Sonnet 4.6 79.5% against Gemma 4 26B A4B 43.6%, 36.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Gemma 4 26B A4B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.6BarsGemma 4 26B A4BTies
Coding90
Intelligence20
Agentic work20
Reasoning80
Math21
Knowledge41
General204
All shared boards476
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
LiveBench coding66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev15231360Claude Sonnet 4.6
AA Coding Index63.039.3Claude Sonnet 4.6
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)39.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SciCode50.1%40.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%25.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-Bench53.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FrontierCode24.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
WeirdML66.1%35.2%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ALE-BenchNot measured927.2Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: coding15031446Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT14911454Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React15121351Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: HTML15271362Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: from an image1529Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
AA Intelligence Index30.116.7Claude Sonnet 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index152.8141.9Claude Sonnet 4.6
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
AA Agentic Index31.82.9Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: agents building web apps1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1213Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1212Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1197Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1226Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1177Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench research63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser68.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic23.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom79.5%43.6%Claude Sonnet 4.6
APEX-Agents43.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld 2.09.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld72.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$7,204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
GPQA Diamond85.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning86.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%79.2%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%19.3%Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.4%73.2%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ARC-AGI86.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles16.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851438Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: expert15001447Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14931448Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams13061264Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: homework13111293Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
AIME92.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME85.8%82.2%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ProofBench45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math14621470Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14831475Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science14741446Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14511428Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government14701457Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14641429Claude Sonnet 4.6
FACTS Benchmark Suite37.0%42.7%Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
Design Arena: websites1284Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1269Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1258Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1278Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1275Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1196Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1235Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench design71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index204
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)46.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IFBench56.6%72.4%Gemma 4 26B A4B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%65.7%Claude Sonnet 4.6
DTBench89.9%74.9%Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMCA46.5%29.7%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ExploitBench23.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14581434Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following14761420Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing14351400Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision12831260Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: English14721444Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14401421Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese14911495Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: German1428Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1420Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1410Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French14651460Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish14641415Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Russian14401434Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14641441Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries14791427Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language14441405Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14311403Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: English12981256Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: Chinese13071312Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: reading text12961268Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: humor12481272Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1297Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things11951191Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: creative writing12721256Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Document1482Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.011Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.195Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.750Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Google Gemma 4 26B A4B
MakerAnthropicGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 17, 2026April 3, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.60
Coding index57.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved task$1.68Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Gemma 4 26B A4B for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: math or FACTS Benchmark Suite, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B comparison based on?

53 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Gemma 4 26B A4B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next