Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads Qwen3.6 27B on coding, 39.5 to 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.6 27B costs 5.6x less per output token ($2.70 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
7
Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
9
vs boards won of 17 shared, 1 tied

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding: it scores 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B.

Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($2.70 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
17
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
83
Qwen3.6 27B only
8
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 12.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.8% against Qwen3.6 27B 91.1%, 13.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.6 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsQwen3.6 27BTies
Coding111 tie
Intelligence11
Agentic work01
Reasoning11
Math02
Knowledge22
General21
All shared boards791 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1394Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index52.153.7Qwen3.6 27B
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%70.0%Tie
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%11.9%Claude Sonnet 4.5
SciCodeNot measured42.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1488Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1473Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.721.4Qwen3.6 27B
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7146.2Claude Sonnet 4.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Agentic Index15.818.5Qwen3.6 27B
Design Arena: agents building web apps1060Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1136Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)73.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MCP Atlas59.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%85.9%Qwen3.6 27B
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%7.0%Claude Sonnet 4.5
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1462Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1483Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1471Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%91.1%Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%35.1%Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1449Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1462Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MathArena12.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%53.2%Claude Sonnet 4.5
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%62.3%Qwen3.6 27B
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%71.3%Claude Sonnet 4.5
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%68.3%Qwen3.6 27B
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1444Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1451Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1440Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
PRBench Finance43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
PRBench Legal40.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1189Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1170Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1157Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1182Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1114Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1205Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%45.6%Qwen3.6 27B
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured67.6%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
DTBench83.2%78.1%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMCA38.8%34.5%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text1438Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1459Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1442Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1425Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1460Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1427Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1390Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1402Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1459Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1458Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1437Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1465Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1475Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1442Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1428Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MultiChallenge55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1026Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.6 27B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.6 27B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.45
Output $/Mtok$15.00$2.70
Coding index39.536.8
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$1.16$1.30
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding: it scores 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B. Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($2.70 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $1.16 and Qwen3.6 27B $1.30.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-qwen3-6-27b" title="Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-qwen3-6-27b">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B</a></p>