LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B

Updated October 21, 2026. 36 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
59.1
Overall
20.7
Output $/M
$15.00
34
Qwen3.5-27BQwen
Coding
22.6
Overall
22.9
Output $/M
$2.16
2
vs boards won of 36 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding: it scores 59.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Qwen3.5-27B.

Pick Qwen3.5-27B when output tokens cost 6.9x less, or when what matters is AA Intelligence Index or LMArena Text: Chinese, where it leads.

Shared results
36
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
56
Qwen3.5-27B only
17
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 59.1 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.5-27B 22.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 22.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vending-Bench 2: Claude Sonnet 4.5 $3,839 against Qwen3.5-27B $202, 22.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Qwen3.5-27B $2.16 per million output tokens, 6.9x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.5-27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsQwen3.5-27BTies
Coding60
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General181
All shared boards342
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev13941358Claude Sonnet 4.5
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%39.5%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured349.4Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: coding14881427Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14731431Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React13861346Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML13991386Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.722.9Qwen3.5-27B
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1060Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.9%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839$202Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.8%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621415Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14831427Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14711429Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1256Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14491429Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14621429Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14481437Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441425Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14511405Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14401399Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1173Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1158Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1183Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1114Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index181
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured75.6%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.7%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
DTBench83.2%82.4%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMCA38.8%34.0%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text14381409Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14591393Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421362Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena VisionNot measured1241Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: English14501425Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14251390Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14601478Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: German14271392Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13901346Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean14021359Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: French14591410Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14581407Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14371390Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish14231375Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14651410Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14751413Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14421380Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14281363Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1246Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1301Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1246Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1227Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1170Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1210Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1224Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-27B$0.0014Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-27B$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-27B$0.076Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3.5-27B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3.5-27B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025February 25, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.27
Output $/Mtok$15.00$2.16
Coding index59.122.6
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen3.5-27B for coding?

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding: it scores 59.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Qwen3.5-27B. Pick Qwen3.5-27B when output tokens cost 6.9x less, or when what matters is AA Intelligence Index or LMArena Text: Chinese, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3.5-27B?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.27 and $2.16. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3.5-27B?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-27B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next