Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Claude Opus 4.6 leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 31.9 to 9.6, and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs 22.7x less per output token ($1.10 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.2
Overall
66.0
Output $/M
$25.00
35
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
1
vs boards won of 36 shared

Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Only Claude Opus 4.6 has a coding score, 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($1.10 vs $25.00 per million) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.

Shared results
36
Claude Opus 4.6 only
74
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.6 57.2 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 50.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Claude Opus 4.6 92.1% against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 41.5%, 50.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.6 $25.00 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct $1.10 per million output tokens, 22.7x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.6BarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning60
Math20
Knowledge40
General181
All shared boards351
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1547Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.4%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)48.5%9.8%Claude Opus 4.6
Terminal-Bench79.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierCode26.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GSO-Bench41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
WeirdML78.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Cybench93.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding15341440Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT15271447Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React1539Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1559Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1543Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index31.99.6Claude Opus 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index155.7Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1206Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1220Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1207Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1197Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1212Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.1%41.5%Claude Opus 4.6
APEX-Agents46.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
METR time horizons78.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Remote Labor Index4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$8,018Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond89.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%75.9%Claude Opus 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%12.6%Claude Opus 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI94.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-269.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleBench67.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15251428Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: expert15441417Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15301431Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams1340Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%66.7%Claude Opus 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured84.3Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.3%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math15181440Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work15251434Claude Opus 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro89.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science15191434Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15041455Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government15121431Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14971422Claude Opus 4.6
FACTS Benchmark Suite41.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1291Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1281Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1277Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1279Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1273Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1288Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1227Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1255Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index181
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
IFBench53.1%60.7%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%63.7%Claude Opus 4.6
DTBench91.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMCA55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured55.6%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
CL-bench20.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench Life17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text15011417Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following15211388Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing15051333Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision1316Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English15111421Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14881407Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese15511460Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: German15001416Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Japanese14881395Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Korean14641363Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: French15121414Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish15101435Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Russian14971404Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish14991398Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: multi-turn15111416Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries15181402Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language15021355Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14921349Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: English1324Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1370Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1314Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1274Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.018Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.325Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0083Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$1.25Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 4, 2026September 11, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.10
Output $/Mtok$25.00$1.10
Coding index57.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$1.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for coding?

Only Claude Opus 4.6 has a coding score, 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($1.10 vs $25.00 per million) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.10 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.6, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.6's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next