Claude Opus 4.1 vs Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 leads Claude Opus 4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 28.2 to 22.8, and Solar Pro 4 costs 125.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Opus 4.1 or Solar Pro 4: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Design Arena: data viz, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 37
- Claude Opus 4.1 only
- 36
- Solar Pro 4 only
- 8
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 leads, 28.2 against 22.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a GPQA Diamond result, 76.3%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a AIME result, 78.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.9%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Tied at 1176.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 takes 524K tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 4
Claude Opus 4.1 $0.052, Solar Pro 4 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 8.7 points apart on average over 17 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: Polish: Claude Opus 4.1 1413 against Solar Pro 4 1304, 18.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 125.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.1 | Bars | Solar Pro 4 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 2 | 3 | 1 tie | |
| General | 16 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 31 | 5 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | 1371 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 52.7 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 66.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 48.0% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 38.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Cybench | 42.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 179.3 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1479 | 1438 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1456 | 1431 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1363 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1399 | 1371 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| SciCode | 4.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.8 | 28.2 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1105 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| METR time horizons | 66.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| GDPval | 43.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 77.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 89.1% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 29.8% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 77.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| SimpleBench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| EBR-bench | 7.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| VPCT | 35.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1442 | 1400 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1438 | 1428 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1451 | 1427 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 78.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 95.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 94.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 68.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 12.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1431 | 1421 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1434 | 1427 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 61.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 93.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 47.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1422 | 1404 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1416 | 1374 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1421 | 1383 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1406 | 1381 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 40.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1176 | 1176 | Tie |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1162 | 1147 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1171 | 1169 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1166 | 1178 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1152 | 1178 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1170 | 1181 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1151 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1167 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index161
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 31.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 73.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 70.7% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| DTBench | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMCA | 37.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 84.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1388 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1435 | 1375 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1412 | 1317 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1433 | 1414 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1405 | 1363 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1427 | 1422 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1413 | 1358 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1377 | 1320 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1381 | 1383 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1433 | 1400 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1448 | 1409 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1422 | 1357 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1413 | 1304 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1444 | 1385 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1455 | 1382 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1418 | 1344 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1398 | 1332 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 4.1 | Upstage Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Upstage |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 5, 2025 | August 10, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $15.00 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $75.00 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Design Arena: data viz, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Solar Pro 4?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Solar Pro 4?
Solar Pro 4, with 524K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?
37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.