Claude Opus 4.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 68.2x less per output token than Claude Opus 4.1 ($1.10 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Opus 4.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 27
- Claude Opus 4.1 only
- 46
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 22.8.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a GPQA Diamond result, 76.3%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a AIME result, 78.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.9%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B leads, 1250 against 1176.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Claude Opus 4.1 $0.052, Beam 1.0 501B A23B $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Web design, 7.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: websites: Claude Opus 4.1 1176 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1250, 9.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 68.2x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.1 | Bars | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 1 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 3 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 2 | ||
| General | 7 | 5 | ||
| All shared boards | 11 | 16 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | 1437 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 66.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 38.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Cybench | 42.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1479 | 1473 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1456 | 1461 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1443 | Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1399 | 1436 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| SciCode | 4.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| METR time horizons | 66.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| GDPval | 43.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 77.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 77.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| SimpleBench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| EBR-bench | 7.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| VPCT | 35.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1442 | 1442 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1438 | 1447 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1451 | 1451 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 78.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 95.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 94.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 68.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 12.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1431 | 1459 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1434 | 1475 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 61.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 93.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 47.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1422 | 1430 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1416 | 1376 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1421 | 1433 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1406 | 1430 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 40.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1176 | 1250 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1162 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1171 | 1224 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1166 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1152 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1170 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1152 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1167 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index75
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 31.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 73.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| DTBench | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMCA | 37.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 84.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1425 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1435 | 1430 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1412 | 1390 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1433 | 1436 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1405 | 1413 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1427 | 1424 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1413 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1377 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1381 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1433 | 1461 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1448 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1422 | 1412 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1413 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1444 | 1414 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1455 | 1429 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1418 | 1400 | Claude Opus 4.1 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1398 | 1399 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 4.1 | Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Reflection |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | August 5, 2025 | October 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $15.00 | $0.35 |
| Output $/Mtok | $75.00 | $1.10 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?
27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.