Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 68.2x less per output token than Claude Opus 4.1 ($1.10 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
No data
Overall
50.2
Output $/M
$75.00
11
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
16
vs boards won of 27 shared

Claude Opus 4.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
27
Claude Opus 4.1 only
46
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 7.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: Claude Opus 4.1 1176 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1250, 9.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 68.2x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding13
Reasoning21
Math02
Knowledge13
Web design02
General75
All shared boards1116
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDev13901437Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
WeirdML45.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14791473Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14561461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13991436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.8Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond76.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SimpleBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
EBR-bench7.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421442Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: expert14381447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511451Claude Opus 4.1
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AIME78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14311459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro87.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14221430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14161376Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14211433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance14061430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites11761250Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI components1162Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev11711224Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data viz1166Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index75
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMCA37.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text14191425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following14351430Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14121390Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: English14331436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English14051413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese14271424Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: German1413Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1377Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1381Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: French14331461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1448Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14221412Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Polish1413Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14441414Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14551429Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14181400Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13981399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerAnthropicReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$15.00$0.35
Output $/Mtok$75.00$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next