Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Mistral Medium 3

Updated October 21, 2026. 37 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
No data
Overall
22.8
Output $/M
$75.00
37
Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
9.0
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 37 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 200K against 131K tokens.

Shared results
37
Claude Opus 4.1 only
34
Mistral Medium 3 only
20
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 14.5 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Claude Opus 4.1 1171 against Mistral Medium 3 1018, 19.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 per million output tokens, 37.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsMistral Medium 3Ties
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design60
General180
All shared boards370
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
LMArena WebDev1390Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
WeirdML45.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14791385Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14561385Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.89.0Claude Opus 4.1
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1134.0Claude Opus 4.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured24.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
GPQA Diamond76.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.1%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SimpleBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
EBR-bench7.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421364Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: expert14381342Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511374Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1155Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
AIME78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured30.3Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14311353Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341354Claude Opus 4.1
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
MMLU Pro87.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: science14221381Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14161381Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14211384Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14061352Claude Opus 4.1
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
Design Arena: websites11771079Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: UI components11641024Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: game dev11711018Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: data viz11661034Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: 3D11531083Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: all code categories11711069Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: SVG1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
IFBenchNot measured39.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured31.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
DTBench80.0%62.3%Claude Opus 4.1
LMCA37.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text14191370Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14351338Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14121343Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1157Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: English14331385Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: non-English14051353Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14271374Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: German14131377Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13771316Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Korean13811304Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: French14331368Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14481364Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Russian14221359Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Polish14131371Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14441384Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14551360Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14181352Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13981335Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1161Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1154Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1094Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1146Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1Mistral Medium 3
MakerAnthropicMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025May 7, 2025
Context window200K131K
Input $/Mtok$15.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$75.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 200K against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Mistral Medium 3?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Mistral Medium 3?

Claude Opus 4.1, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Medium 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next