LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Updated October 21, 2026. 55 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Claude Opus 4.1 Replace Llama 4 Maverick
Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
27.2
Overall
22.8
Output $/M
$75.00
54
Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
18.1
Overall
9.3
Output $/M
$0.6525
1
vs boards won of 55 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for coding: it scores 27.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 114.9x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 200K tokens.

Model AClaude Opus 4.1Anthropic27.2/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BLlama 4 MaverickMeta Llama18.1/1002 independent benchmarks$1.491 per solved task
Shared results
55
Claude Opus 4.1 only
16
Llama 4 Maverick only
29
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 27.2 from 1 benchmark, Llama 4 Maverick 18.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 36.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME: Claude Opus 4.1 78.2% against Llama 4 Maverick 25.2%, 53.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Llama 4 Maverick $0.6525 per million output tokens, 114.9x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsLlama 4 MaverickTies
Coding40
Intelligence20
Reasoning60
Math50
Knowledge100
Web design60
General211
All shared boards541
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured15.6%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured21.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena WebDev1390Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%47.3%Claude Opus 4.1
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCodeNot measured31.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
WeirdML45.9%24.5%Claude Opus 4.1
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured173.0Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: coding14791301Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14561299Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.89.3Claude Opus 4.1
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1132.2Claude Opus 4.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.6Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured17.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
GPQA Diamond76.3%69.4%Claude Opus 4.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%71.7%Claude Opus 4.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured67.1%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
ARC-AGINot measured4.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench60.0%27.7%Claude Opus 4.1
Mystery game puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
EBR-bench7.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421281Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: expert14381259Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511295Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1134Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1164Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AIME78.2%25.2%Claude Opus 4.1
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%85.2%Claude Opus 4.1
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%92.4%Claude Opus 4.1
AA Math IndexNot measured19.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured19.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14311299Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341295Claude Opus 4.1
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
MMLU Pro87.9%79.4%Claude Opus 4.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%77.8%Claude Opus 4.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%66.6%Claude Opus 4.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%58.5%Claude Opus 4.1
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%43.3%Claude Opus 4.1
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%36.5%Claude Opus 4.1
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science14221288Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14161275Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14211286Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14061260Claude Opus 4.1
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Design Arena: websites1177871Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: UI components1164899Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: game dev1172838Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: data viz1166882Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: 3D1153901Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: all code categories1171880Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: SVG1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index211
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%35.7%Llama 4 Maverick
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%54.2%Claude Opus 4.1
IFBenchNot measured43.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured50.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
DTBench80.0%61.9%Claude Opus 4.1
LMCA37.1%15.9%Claude Opus 4.1
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured46.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%62.0%Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text14191287Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14351267Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14121266Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1142Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English14331303Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: non-English14051269Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14271277Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: German14131291Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13771206Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Korean13811203Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: French14331259Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14481293Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Russian14221286Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Polish14131275Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14441289Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14551280Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14181277Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13981250Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1150Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1141Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1100Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1099Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.0005Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.011Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
Llama 4 Maverick$0.044Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1Meta Llama 4 Maverick
MakerAnthropicMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025April 5, 2025
Context window200K524K
Input $/Mtok$15.00$0.1875
Output $/Mtok$75.00$0.6525
Coding index27.218.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.491
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Llama 4 Maverick for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for coding: it scores 27.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 114.9x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 200K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.1875 and $0.6525. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison based on?

55 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Llama 4 Maverick's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next