Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Devstral 2 2512

Claude Opus 4.1 leads Devstral 2 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 8.6, and Devstral 2 2512 costs 37.5x less per output token ($2.00 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
No data
Overall
50.2
Output $/M
$75.00
2
Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

Claude Opus 4.1 or Devstral 2 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
2
Claude Opus 4.1 only
71
Devstral 2 2512 only
4
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 14.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.1 66.5% against Devstral 2 2512 51.8%, 14.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 per million output tokens, 37.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Devstral 2 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsDevstral 2 2512Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
All shared boards20
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured53.8%Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
LMArena WebDev1390Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured31.3Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%51.8%Claude Opus 4.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured62.8%Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
WeirdML45.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding1479Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1456Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.88.6Claude Opus 4.1
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured2.3Only Devstral 2 2512 measured
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond76.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SimpleBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
EBR-bench7.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1442Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1438Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1451Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
AIME78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math1431Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1434Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
MMLU Pro87.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science1422Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1416Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1421Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1406Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites1176Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1162Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1171Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1166Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMCA37.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text1419Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1435Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1412Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1405Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1427Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: German1413Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1377Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1381Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: French1433Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1448Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1422Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1413Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1444Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1455Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1418Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1398Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Devstral 2 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Devstral 2 2512
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1Mistral Devstral 2 2512
MakerAnthropicMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025December 9, 2025
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$15.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$75.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.19
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Devstral 2 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Devstral 2 2512?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Devstral 2 2512?

Devstral 2 2512, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Devstral 2 2512 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Devstral 2 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next