Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 leads Trinity Large Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.4 to 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking costs 5.2x less per output token ($0.80 vs $4.18 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.

Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
0
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
56.4
Overall
54.6
Output $/M
$4.18
41
vs boards won of 41 shared

Trinity Large Thinking or Mistral Large 4: which to pick

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Trinity Large Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.80 vs $4.18 per million).

Shared results
41
Trinity Large Thinking only
11
Mistral Large 4 only
40
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Trinity Large Thinking not benchmarked, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 31.8 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Trinity Large Thinking 1231 against Mistral Large 4 1559, 54.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 5.2x apart.
Context window
Trinity Large Thinking takes 262K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryTrinity Large ThinkingBarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding06
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design08
General016
All shared boards041
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev12381543Mistral Large 4
AA Coding Index25.8Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SciCode40.6%54.2%Mistral Large 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.7%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1213.2Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding13571478Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: software and IT13621467Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: React12311559Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: HTML12401487Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.838.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.0Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13421444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: expert13591444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13561442Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1288Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: math13651469Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: mathematical work13501462Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
CaseLaw (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: science13551448Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: legal and government13451425Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: business and finance13291439Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websites11371258Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: UI components10451275Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: game dev10791226Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: data viz10981274Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: 3D10821253Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: all code categories11171259Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: SVG10171233Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: ASCII art10411202Mistral Large 4
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench56.3%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBenchNot measured88.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMCANot measured35.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%28.1%Mistral Large 4
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text13401431Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: instruction following13261422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: creative writing13081363Mistral Large 4
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: English13561433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: non-English13251422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Chinese13711492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: German1356Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13121415Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Korean1306Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: French13661492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Spanish13271455Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Russian13381417Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Polish1312Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201435Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: longer queries13181428Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: writing and language13171386Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12961378Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1283Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1284Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.0006Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.015Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.058Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationArcee AI Trinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 4
MakerArcee AIMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026October 6, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.36
Output $/Mtok$0.80$4.18
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.4
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Trinity Large Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.80 vs $4.18 per million).

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or Mistral Large 4?

Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next