Trinity Large Thinking vs MiniMax M3
Updated October 21, 2026. 51 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick MiniMax M3 for coding: it scores 57.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 5.4 for Trinity Large Thinking.
Pick Trinity Large Thinking when output tokens cost 1.5x less, or when the benchmark that matters is τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 51
- Trinity Large Thinking only
- 1
- MiniMax M3 only
- 65
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 scores 57.8 against 5.4.
1 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 29.2 against 10.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 29.5 against 1.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a GPQA Diamond result, 92.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a MMLU Pro result, 84.2%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 1257 against 1137.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Trinity Large Thinking
Trinity Large Thinking $0.0006, MiniMax M3 $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has the number, $0.56.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Trinity Large Thinking 5.4 from 1 benchmark, MiniMax M3 57.8 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 25.9 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Trinity Large Thinking 38.0% against MiniMax M3 83.0%, 45.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
- Context window
- Trinity Large Thinking takes 262K tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Trinity Large Thinking | Bars | MiniMax M3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 8 | ||
| General | 0 | 20 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 50 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 70.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1238 | 1482 | MiniMax M3 |
| AA Coding Index | 25.8 | 58.6 | MiniMax M3 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.5% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SciCode | 40.6% | 47.1% | MiniMax M3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 22.7% | 42.4% | MiniMax M3 |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 14.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 640.0 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1357 | 1470 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1362 | 1466 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1231 | 1478 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1240 | 1455 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1470 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 10.8 | 29.2 | MiniMax M3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 146.9 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.0 | 29.5 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1200 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1197 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1169 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1164 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1158 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1180 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1205 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1021 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 68.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 8.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 12.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 20.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 29.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 90.1% | 88.9% | Trinity Large Thinking |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 37.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 4.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $2,158 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 92.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 74.5% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 81.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 75.2% | 92.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 15.8% | 39.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 90.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 45.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 13.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 8.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1342 | 1447 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1359 | 1461 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1356 | 1455 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1268 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 71.1% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 18.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1365 | 1429 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1350 | 1448 | MiniMax M3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 84.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 57.9% | Not measured | Only Trinity Large Thinking measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 54.7% | 68.1% | MiniMax M3 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1355 | 1452 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1349 | 1441 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1345 | 1437 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1329 | 1434 | MiniMax M3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1137 | 1257 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1045 | 1246 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1079 | 1210 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1098 | 1235 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1082 | 1209 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1117 | 1247 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1016 | 1161 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1041 | 1161 | MiniMax M3 |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 66.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.1% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 60.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| IFBench | 56.3% | 82.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 38.0% | 83.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| DTBench | Not measured | 78.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 33.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | 55.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1433 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1326 | 1433 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1308 | 1404 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1251 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1356 | 1443 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1325 | 1420 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1371 | 1466 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1356 | 1428 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1312 | 1380 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1306 | 1373 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1366 | 1444 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1327 | 1433 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1338 | 1426 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1312 | 1423 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1320 | 1443 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1318 | 1446 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1317 | 1419 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1296 | 1403 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1263 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1311 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1259 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1235 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1197 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1234 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1435 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Trinity Large Thinking costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Trinity Large Thinking costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Trinity Large Thinking costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Arcee AI Trinity Large Thinking | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Arcee AI | MiniMax |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | April 1, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.25 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.80 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 5.4 | 57.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.56 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Trinity Large Thinking better than MiniMax M3 for coding?
Pick MiniMax M3 for coding: it scores 57.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 5.4 for Trinity Large Thinking. Pick Trinity Large Thinking when output tokens cost 1.5x less, or when the benchmark that matters is τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or MiniMax M3?
Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?
51 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiniMax M3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.