Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Micro 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Updated October 21, 2026. 34 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Micro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.3
Overall
30.1
Output $/M
$15.00
34
vs boards won of 34 shared

Decision reading

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Micro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 107.1x less.

Shared results
34
Nova Micro 1.0 only
5
Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
83
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Micro 1.0 not benchmarked, Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 65.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Nova Micro 1.0 13.0% against Claude Sonnet 4.6 80.0%, 67.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Micro 1.0 $0.14 against Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 per million output tokens, 107.1x apart.
Context window
Nova Micro 1.0 takes 128K tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Micro 1.0BarsClaude Sonnet 4.6Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards034
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured66.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1523Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured63.0Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured77.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.9%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured57.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured49.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured50.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%53.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-BenchNot measured53.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured24.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
WeirdMLNot measured66.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding12181503Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT12151491Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1512Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1527Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1529Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.930.1Claude Sonnet 4.6
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured152.8Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured31.8Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1190Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1213Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1212Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1203Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1226Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1177Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured63.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured68.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured23.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured51.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.2%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%79.5%Claude Sonnet 4.6
APEX-AgentsNot measured43.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured9.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured54.9%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorldNot measured72.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$7,204Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured85.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured86.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)35.8%87.5%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.6%33.6%Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGINot measured86.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured60.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured23.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured16.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11911485Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: expert11831500Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12031493Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1306Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1311Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
AIMENot measured92.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured85.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProofBenchNot measured45.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math12061462Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work12121483Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured92.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)53.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured35.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMLU70.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12101474Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12071451Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government12211470Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance11821464Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1285Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1272Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1259Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1277Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1234Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1197Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1235Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench designNot measured71.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured62.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured46.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IFBench29.4%56.6%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)13.0%80.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
DTBenchNot measured89.9%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMCANot measured46.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ExploitBenchNot measured23.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text12081458Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following11741476Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing11721435Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena VisionNot measured1283Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English12241472Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English11861440Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese12091491Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: German11921428Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Japanese11541420Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Korean11501410Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: French12381465Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish12251464Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Russian11851440Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1443Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11781464Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries12051479Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language11921444Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11631431Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1307Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1296Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1248Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1195Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1272Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1482Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Claude Sonnet 4.6Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0001Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.011Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0022Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.195Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0084Exceeds the context window
Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.750Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Micro 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 4.6
SpecificationAmazon Nova Micro 1.0Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6
MakerAmazonAnthropic
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024February 17, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.035$3.00
Output $/Mtok$0.14$15.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.3
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.68
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Micro 1.0 better than Claude Sonnet 4.6 for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Micro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 107.1x less.

Which is cheaper, Nova Micro 1.0 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Micro 1.0 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Sonnet 4.6, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Micro 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Micro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Claude Sonnet 4.6's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next