Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Lite 1.0 vs MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax M2.7 leads Nova Lite 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 6.7, and Nova Lite 1.0 costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.24 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Nova Lite 1.0 Replace MiniMax M2.7
Nova Lite 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.24
0
MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
Coding
36.2
Overall
44.5
Output $/M
$1.20
34
vs boards won of 34 shared

Nova Lite 1.0 or MiniMax M2.7: which to pick

Only MiniMax M2.7 has a coding score, 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.24 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (300K against 205K tokens).

Model ANova Lite 1.0AmazonNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BMiniMax M2.7MiniMax36.2/1003 independent benchmarks$0.64 per solved task
Shared results
34
Nova Lite 1.0 only
7
MiniMax M2.7 only
40
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked, MiniMax M2.7 36.2 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 67.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nova Lite 1.0 17.5% against MiniMax M2.7 84.8%, 67.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 against MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Nova Lite 1.0 takes 300K tokens, MiniMax M2.7 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Lite 1.0BarsMiniMax M2.7Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards034
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1399Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.6Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured73.8%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured8.7%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)16.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured50.1%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%39.4%MiniMax M2.7
Terminal-BenchNot measured45.1%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
WeirdMLNot measured37.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured599.3Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: coding12391454MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: software and IT12411446MiniMax M2.7
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1401Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.722.8MiniMax M2.7
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured145.8Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.3Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured27.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured6.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured28.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.5%84.8%MiniMax M2.7
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.6%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%87.4%MiniMax M2.7
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%29.6%MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts12201422MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: expert12011443MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12261441MiniMax M2.7
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
AIMENot measured91.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
ProofBenchNot measured3.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: math12271421MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: mathematical work12351437MiniMax M2.7
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
MMLU ProNot measured80.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured60.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.2%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured34.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)59.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
MMLU77.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12321416MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12131409MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: legal and government12381403MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: business and finance12191407MiniMax M2.7
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1243Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1209Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1233Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1195Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1233Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1137Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1136Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
IFBench34.1%75.7%MiniMax M2.7
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)19.0%78.3%MiniMax M2.7
ExploitBenchNot measured13.3%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text12291405MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: instruction following12051405MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: creative writing11971354MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Vision990Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English12431426MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: non-English12081382MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: Chinese12251442MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: German12291398MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: Japanese11531260MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: Korean11531314MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: French12381424MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: Spanish12261402MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: Russian12161383MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1387Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11991412MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: longer queries12341418MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: writing and language12111376MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11761360MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Vision: English999Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0002Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.0009Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0037Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.019Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.014Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.072Exceeds the context window

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Lite 1.0 and MiniMax M2.7
SpecificationAmazon Nova Lite 1.0MiniMax M2.7
MakerAmazonMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024March 18, 2026
Context window300K205K
Input $/Mtok$0.06$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.24$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked36.2
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Lite 1.0 better than MiniMax M2.7 for coding?

Only MiniMax M2.7 has a coding score, 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.24 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (300K against 205K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or MiniMax M2.7?

Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or MiniMax M2.7?

Nova Lite 1.0, with 300K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Lite 1.0 vs MiniMax M2.7 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Lite 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.7's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next