Nova Lite 1.0 vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Updated October 21, 2026. 36 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Nova Lite 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 18.8x less.
- Shared results
- 36
- Nova Lite 1.0 only
- 5
- GPT-5.4 Mini only
- 52
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.4 Mini
GPT-5.4 Mini leads, 24.1 against 6.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AA Agentic Index result, 17.9.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a GPQA Diamond result, 83.1%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AIME result, 95.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a MMLU Pro result, 84.5%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.4 Mini
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens against 300K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0
Nova Lite 1.0 $0.0002, GPT-5.4 Mini $0.0030 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has the number, $0.70.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 65.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: Nova Lite 1.0 17.5% against GPT-5.4 Mini 83.3%, 65.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 against GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 per million output tokens, 18.8x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Lite 1.0 takes 300K tokens, GPT-5.4 Mini 400K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Lite 1.0 | Bars | GPT-5.4 Mini | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 20 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 36 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1397 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 56.1 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 81.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 16.7% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 52.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 0.8% | 52.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 27.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 60.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1188.6 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1239 | 1438 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1241 | 1436 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1386 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1419 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.7 | 24.1 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 148.7 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 17.9 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 8.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 17.5% | 83.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 36.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 83.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 43.3% | 87.5% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.3% | 28.1% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 86.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 63.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 18.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 23.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 11.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1220 | 1424 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1201 | 1435 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1226 | 1420 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1266 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1285 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 95.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| AA Math Index | 7.0 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 88.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 51.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 9.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 21.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1227 | 1418 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1235 | 1429 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 84.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 59.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 29.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MMLU | 77.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1232 | 1417 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1213 | 1395 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1238 | 1414 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1219 | 1418 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 54.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| IFBench | 34.1% | 73.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 19.0% | 77.0% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| DTBench | Not measured | 80.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 40.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1412 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1205 | 1405 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1197 | 1370 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Vision | 990 | 1245 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: English | 1243 | 1412 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1208 | 1405 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1225 | 1446 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: German | 1229 | 1408 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1153 | 1375 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1153 | 1370 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: French | 1238 | 1441 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1226 | 1405 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1216 | 1417 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1415 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1199 | 1429 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1234 | 1408 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1211 | 1393 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1176 | 1373 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Vision: English | 999 | 1244 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1286 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1253 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1235 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1218 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1222 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Lite 1.0 | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | March 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 300K | 400K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.06 | $0.75 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.24 | $4.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 35.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.70 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Lite 1.0 better than GPT-5.4 Mini for coding?
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Lite 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 18.8x less.
Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or GPT-5.4 Mini?
Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 and $4.50. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or GPT-5.4 Mini?
GPT-5.4 Mini, with 400K tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Lite 1.0 vs GPT-5.4 Mini comparison based on?
36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Lite 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Mini's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.