Nova Lite 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Nova Lite 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 6.7, and Nova Lite 1.0 costs 2.5x less per output token ($0.24 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.
Nova Lite 1.0 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: which to pick
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($0.24 vs $0.60 per million).
- Shared results
- 3
- Nova Lite 1.0 only
- 38
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
- 36
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads, 39.5 against 6.7.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1312.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a Vals Index result, 61.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens against 300K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0
Nova Lite 1.0 $0.0002, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- General, 63.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Nova Lite 1.0 19.0% against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 82.7%, 63.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Lite 1.0 takes 300K tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Lite 1.0 | Bars | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 3 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 96.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1664 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.8% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.7% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 16.7% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 55.9% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 0.8% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1622.0 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1239 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1241 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1667 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1687 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.7 | 39.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1230 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 79.5% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 76.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 50.9% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.4% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.8% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 17.5% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 89.1% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 43.3% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.3% | 43.3% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 93.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 46.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 49.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1220 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1201 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1226 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 7.0 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 99.4% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 71.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 46.3% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1227 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1235 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 59.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 42.5% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| MMLU | 77.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1232 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1213 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1238 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1219 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1312 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1300 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1362 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1335 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1372 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1334 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1243 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 83.4% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 61.3% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 79.5% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| IFBench | 34.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 19.0% | 82.7% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| LMArena Text | 1229 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1205 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1197 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Vision | 990 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1243 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1208 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1225 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1229 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1153 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1153 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1238 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1226 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1216 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1199 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1234 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1211 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1176 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 999 | Not measured | Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nova Lite 1.0 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Lite 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | October 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 300K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.06 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.24 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 70.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Lite 1.0 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding?
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($0.24 vs $0.60 per million).
Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Lite 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 comparison based on?
3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Lite 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.