Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.8 to 9.9, and MiMo-V2.5 costs 5.7x less per output token ($0.336 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 44 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Replace MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
12
MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
Coding
50.0
Overall
50.7
Output $/M
$0.336
32
vs boards won of 44 shared

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.

Model AQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi50.0/1003 independent benchmarks$0.01 per solved task
Shared results
44
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
5
MiMo-V2.5 only
36
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 36.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1% against MiMo-V2.5 90.6%, 36.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 5.7x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct takes 262K tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructBarsMiMo-V2.5Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning16
Math02
Knowledge31
General818
All shared boards1232
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1438Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured56.8Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured42.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured60.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)64.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured43.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)11.4%41.7%MiMo-V2.5
ALE-BenchNot measured514.0Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14381469MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14421463MiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1429Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.921.8MiMo-V2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.8Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured36.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom54.1%90.6%MiMo-V2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured81.6%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured80.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.2%84.9%MiMo-V2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.9%27.2%MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts14281450MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: expert14421459MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14391461MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12551269MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: homework12771262Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Math Index88.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)88.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured16.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14251436MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14191451MiMo-V2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured82.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured78.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured31.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14441440Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14311432MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14381425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance14331432Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1265Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1255Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1249Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1250Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1215Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1260Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1179Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1140Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index818
General benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured52.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
IFBench56.5%67.1%MiMo-V2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)63.7%73.0%MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text14201428MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14061435MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13661393MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision12471247MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: English14291447MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: non-English14051405MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14631469MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: German14241421Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13851306Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean13941361Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French14521448Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish14281414Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian14081396Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish14191413Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn14281445MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14191445MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13921409MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13681399MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: English12561259MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: Chinese12831326MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: reading text12531256MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: humor12091226MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: captioning1281Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12491189Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: creative writing12201230MiMo-V2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo-V2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0094Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.037Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5
SpecificationQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructXiaomi MiMo-V2.5
MakerQwenXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 23, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.21$0.168
Output $/Mtok$1.90$0.336
Coding indexNot benchmarked50.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.01
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 per million input tokens and $1.90 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Cost per solved task is known for MiMo-V2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next