Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Solar Mini 4

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Solar Mini 4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.2 to 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 costs 6.4x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
5
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
2
vs boards won of 7 shared

Qwen3.7 Plus or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Mini 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Solar Mini 4 for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.28 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Shared results
7
Qwen3.7 Plus only
68
Solar Mini 4 only
0
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 15.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Qwen3.7 Plus 1262 against Solar Mini 4 1109, 19.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 6.4x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.7 Plus takes 1M tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.7 PlusBarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Coding01
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Web design30
General01
All shared boards52
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Coding Index55.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)46.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode46.1%47.6%Solar Mini 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCode10.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding1473Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1473Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index25.224.1Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index147.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Agentic Index17.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)10.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)49.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
OSWorld 2.02.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%25.8%Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1460Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: expert1466Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1460Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 334.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math1467Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1470Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1451Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websites12691159Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: UI components1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game dev12621109Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: data viz1276Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3D1239Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categories12691150Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: SVG1208Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1143Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal Index53.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench78.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.0%83.3%Solar Mini 4
DTBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1439Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1438Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English1458Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: non-English1445Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1509Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: German1471Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1412Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Korean1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: French1472Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Russian1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Polish1449Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1459Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1422Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: English1280Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1332Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1288Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humor1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1258Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationQwen3.7 PlusUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 3, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window1M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.32$0.05
Output $/Mtok$1.28$0.20
Coding index33.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Mini 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Solar Mini 4 for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.28 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 per million input tokens and $1.28 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.7 Plus vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3.7 Plus's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next