Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads Qwen3.7 Plus on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 25.2, and Hy3 preview costs 2.1x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
30
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
3
vs boards won of 33 shared

Qwen3.7 Plus or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy3 preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hy3 preview for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.28 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
33
Qwen3.7 Plus only
42
Hy3 preview only
3
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 10.3 points apart on average over 15 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: creative writing: Qwen3.7 Plus 1438 against Hy3 preview 1339, 16.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.7 Plus takes 1M tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.7 PlusBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding31
Intelligence01
Agentic work11
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General150
All shared boards303
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding Index55.958.8Hy3 preview
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)46.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode46.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%34.1%Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode10.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding14731421Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14731423Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index25.225.3Hy3 preview
Epoch Capabilities Index147.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic Index17.524.1Hy3 preview
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)10.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)49.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%92.7%Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.02.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.0%86.7%Qwen3.7 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%27.8%Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14601413Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert14661422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14601416Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagrams1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 334.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math14671424Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14701442Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science14641416Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14641405Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14511430Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance14351397Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1269Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI components1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game dev1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data viz1276Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3D1239Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1269Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVG1208Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1143Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index150
General benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal Index53.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench78.0%63.1%Qwen3.7 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.0%64.7%Qwen3.7 Plus
DTBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text14541401Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following14391383Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing14381339Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English14581409Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English14451390Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese15091435Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German1471Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1412Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Korean1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: French14721425Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14571399Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14571399Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish1449Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14591411Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries14541402Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language14371370Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14221352Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: English1280Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1332Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1288Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humor1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1258Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 preview
SpecificationQwen3.7 PlusTencent Hy3 preview
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 3, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.32$0.18
Output $/Mtok$1.28$0.60
Coding index33.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy3 preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hy3 preview for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.28 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Hy3 preview?

Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 per million input tokens and $1.28 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Hy3 preview?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3.7 Plus's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next