Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.2 to 11.2, at about the same output price ($1.28 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
30
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 30 shared

Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.20 vs $1.28 per million).

Shared results
30
Qwen3.7 Plus only
45
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 21.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Qwen3.7 Plus 55.9 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 17.4, 38.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.7 Plus takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.7 PlusBarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards300
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Coding Index55.917.4Qwen3.7 Plus
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)46.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode46.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCode10.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding14731392Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14731393Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index25.211.2Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index147.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Agentic Index17.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)10.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)49.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
OSWorld 2.02.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14601371Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert14661376Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14601384Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagrams1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 334.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math14671399Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14701390Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science14641384Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14641392Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14511364Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance14351360Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Design Arena: websites1269Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI components1258Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game dev1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data viz1276Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3D1238Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1269Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVG1208Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1143Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal Index53.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench78.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
DTBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text14541368Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following14391344Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing14381314Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English14581392Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English14451342Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese15091407Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German14711356Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Japanese14121280Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Korean14131310Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: French14721351Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14571358Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14571337Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish14491345Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: multi-turn14591346Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries14541353Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language14371330Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14221312Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: English1280Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1332Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1288Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humor1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1258Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.011Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.042Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
SpecificationQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 3, 2026September 11, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.32$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.28$1.20
Coding index33.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.20 vs $1.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 per million input tokens and $1.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.7 Plus's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next