Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash costs 2.7x less per output token than Qwen3.7 Plus ($0.47 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
Qwen3.8 FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.47
vs $1.28 vs $0.47 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash is 2.7x cheaper.

Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 Flash: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.8 Flash for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.47 vs $1.28 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.7 Plus has results on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Qwen3.8 Flash on LiveBench coding, LiveBench research and LiveBench browser. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 against Qwen3.8 Flash $0.47 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
AA Coding Index55.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)46.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode46.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCode10.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding1473Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1473Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index25.2Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Epoch Capabilities Index147.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index17.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LiveBench researchNot measured74.6%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured48.0%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured37.1%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)10.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)49.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
OSWorld 2.02.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1460Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: expert1466Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1460Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 334.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math1467Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1470Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1451Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1269Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI components1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game dev1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data viz1276Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3D1239Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1269Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVG1208Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1143Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LiveBench designNot measured72.8%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured74.2%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal Index53.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench78.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
DTBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1439Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1438Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English1458Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: non-English1445Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1509Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: German1471Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1412Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Korean1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: French1472Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Russian1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Polish1449Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1459Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1422Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: English1280Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1332Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1288Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humor1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1258Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0089Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.035Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
SpecificationQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 Flash
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 3, 2026August 26, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.32$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.28$0.47
Coding index33.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Qwen3.8 Flash for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.8 Flash for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.47 vs $1.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 per million input tokens and $1.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.47. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.7 Plus has results on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Qwen3.8 Flash on LiveBench coding, LiveBench research and LiveBench browser. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next