Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-27B vs Hy4 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 3 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen3.5-27BQwen
Coding
22.6
Overall
22.9
Output $/M
$2.16
0
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
61.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Decision reading

Pick Hy4 preview for coding: it scores 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Qwen3.5-27B.

Pick Qwen3.5-27B when output tokens cost 1.2x less.

Shared results
3
Qwen3.5-27B only
50
Hy4 preview only
21
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-27B 22.6 from 1 benchmark, Hy4 preview 61.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 39.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Qwen3.5-27B 1346 against Hy4 preview 1653, 42.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-27B $2.16 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5-27B takes 262K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-27BBarsHy4 previewTies
Coding03
All shared boards03
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
LMArena WebDev13581631Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Hy4 preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
ALE-Bench349.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: coding1427Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena WebDev: React13461653Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML13861620Hy4 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Vending-Bench 2$202Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: expert1427Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1249Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1256Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena Text: math1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena Text: science1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1405Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
IFBench75.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
DTBench82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMCA34.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text1409Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1393Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1362Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision1241Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: English1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1478Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: German1392Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1346Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1359Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: French1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1407Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1375Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1380Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1363Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: English1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1227Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1170Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1210Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1224Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.0014Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.020Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.076Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-27B and Hy4 preview
SpecificationQwen3.5-27BTencent Hy4 preview
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.834
Output $/Mtok$2.16$2.501
Coding index22.661.6
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-27B better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick Hy4 preview for coding: it scores 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Qwen3.5-27B. Pick Qwen3.5-27B when output tokens cost 1.2x less.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Hy4 preview?

Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $2.16 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-27B or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-27B vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3.5-27B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy4 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next