Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Qwen3 32B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.2 to 7.3, and Qwen3 32B costs 3.2x less per output token ($0.40 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Qwen3 32B Replace Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3 32BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
40.8
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Qwen3 32B or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 32B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 3.2x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.28 per million).

Model AQwen3 32BQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
36
Qwen3 32B only
9
Qwen3.7 Plus only
39
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 32B not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 63.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Qwen3 32B 0.0% against Qwen3.7 Plus 73.0%, 73.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 32B $0.40 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 3.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 32B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 32BBarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding04
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge04
General016
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Aider polyglot40.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured55.9Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)54.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
SciCode36.0%46.1%Qwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%47.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding13571473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT13661473Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.325.2Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index138.4147.0Qwen3.7 Plus
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured17.5Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured49.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom29.8%93.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)48.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
BrowseComp-Plus10.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.8%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%35.6%Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.7%87.9%Qwen3.7 Plus
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13341460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert13621466Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13501460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1292Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Math Index73.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.9%93.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math13991467Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14201470Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: science13721464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13681464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government13241451Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance13181435Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1262Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1276Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1239Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1143Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench36.3%78.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%73.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
DTBench67.5%84.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
LMCA17.3%37.6%Qwen3.7 Plus
Fiction.LiveBench74.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text13401454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following13051439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing12971438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English13591458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English13171445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese13571509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German13411471Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1412Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1413Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1472Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Russian13111457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1449Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13311459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries13271454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language12981437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12791422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1332Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1288Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1258Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkQwen3 32BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.0082Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.032Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 32B and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationQwen3 32BQwen3.7 Plus
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 28, 2025June 3, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.14$0.32
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked33.2
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 32B better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 32B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 3.2x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3 32B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 32B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3 32B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next