Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o4 Mini vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

o4 Mini leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.7 to 11.2, and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 3.7x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
43.0
Output $/M
$4.40
6
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
23
vs boards won of 29 shared

o4 Mini or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o4 Mini for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
29
o4 Mini only
69
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o4 Mini not benchmarked, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 5.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: o4 Mini 1354 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 1407, 8.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o4 Mini $4.40 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
o4 Mini takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo4 MiniBarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingTies
Coding02
Intelligence10
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General512
All shared boards623
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Aider polyglot72.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified64.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Multimodal33.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured17.4Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GSO-Bench3.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
WeirdML52.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding13681392Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: software and IT13671393Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
SciCode10.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.711.2o4 Mini
Epoch Capabilities Index145.5Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom55.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
METR time horizons63.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)53.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
GPQA Diamond74.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.4%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)79.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI58.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-26.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SimpleBench38.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles22.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles5.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
VPCT57.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13511371Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: expert13431376Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13661384Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Vision: diagrams1197Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1234Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AIME83.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)93.4%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
AA Math Index90.7Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)90.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME81.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 336.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 44.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13891399Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: mathematical work13791390Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
MMLU Pro80.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified19.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science13541384Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13611392Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: legal and government13501364Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: business and finance13251360Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
FACTS Benchmark Suite28.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Design Arena: websites985Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI components983Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev1003Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz990Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D854Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories976Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index512
General benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)41.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)69.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
IFBench68.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)61.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
DTBench77.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMCA26.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench77.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)75.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text13531368Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: instruction following13201344Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: creative writing12941314Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Vision1194Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English13671392Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: non-English13371342Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: Chinese13541407Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: German13361356Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: Japanese13081280o4 Mini
LMArena Text: Korean13121310o4 Mini
LMArena Text: French13641351o4 Mini
LMArena Text: Spanish13461358Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: Russian13341337Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: Polish13581345o4 Mini
LMArena Text: multi-turn13501346o4 Mini
LMArena Text: longer queries13151353Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: writing and language13161330Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13081312Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Vision: English1200Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1218Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1197Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1199Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1204Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1166Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.011Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.042Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o4 Mini and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
SpecificationOpenAI o4 MiniQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2025September 11, 2025
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.15
Output $/Mtok$4.40$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o4 Mini better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o4 Mini for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o4 Mini or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

o4 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o4 Mini or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o4 Mini vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o4 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next