LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o4 Mini vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. 15 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
68.6
Overall
16.7
Output $/M
$4.40
11
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
60.4
Overall
9.6
Output $/M
$0.28
3
vs boards won of 15 shared, 1 tied

Decision reading

Pick o4 Mini for coding: it scores 68.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 60.4 for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.

Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct when output tokens cost 15.7x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 200K tokens.

Shared results
15
o4 Mini only
79
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
1
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o4 Mini 68.6 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 60.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 61.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: o4 Mini 90.7 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 29.0, 61.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o4 Mini $4.40 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.28 per million output tokens, 15.7x apart.
Context window
o4 Mini takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo4 MiniBarsQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructTies
Coding201 tie
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math20
Knowledge10
Web design03
General20
All shared boards1131 tie
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot72.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified64.6%60.4%o4 Mini
SWE-bench LiteNot measured49.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Multimodal33.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.9%40.3%o4 Mini
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%15.2%Tie
GSO-Bench3.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
WeirdML52.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding1368Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1367Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.79.6o4 Mini
Epoch Capabilities Index145.5Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom55.6%34.5%o4 Mini
METR time horizons63.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond74.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.4%51.6%o4 Mini
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.5%3.8%o4 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)79.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI58.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-26.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SimpleBench38.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles22.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles5.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
VPCT57.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1351Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1343Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1366Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1197Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1234Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AIME83.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)93.4%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
AA Math Index90.729.0o4 Mini
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)90.7%29.0%o4 Mini
OTIS Mock AIME81.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 336.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 44.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1389Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1379Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro80.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%70.6%o4 Mini
SimpleQA Verified19.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1354Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1361Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1350Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1325Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Web design benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites9851087Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Design Arena: UI components9831046Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Design Arena: game dev1004Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz9901085Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Design Arena: 3D854Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories977Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)41.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)69.1%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
IFBench68.7%32.7%o4 Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)61.0%32.7%o4 Mini
DTBench77.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMCA26.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench77.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)75.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text1353Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1320Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1294Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1194Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1367Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1337Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1354Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1336Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1308Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1312Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1364Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1346Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1334Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1358Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1350Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1315Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1316Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1308Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1200Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1218Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1197Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1199Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1204Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1166Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmarko4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0043Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.017Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI o4 MiniQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2025July 31, 2025
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.07
Output $/Mtok$4.40$0.28
Coding index68.660.4
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o4 Mini better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Pick o4 Mini for coding: it scores 68.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 60.4 for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct. Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct when output tokens cost 15.7x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 200K tokens.

Which is cheaper, o4 Mini or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

o4 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.07 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o4 Mini or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o4 Mini vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o4 Mini's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next