Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 Mini vs Solar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 leads o3 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 28.2 to 12.5, and Solar Pro 4 costs 7.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

o3 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
38.0
Output $/M
$4.40
0
Solar Pro 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

o3 Mini or Solar Pro 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 Mini for work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
33
o3 Mini only
38
Solar Pro 4 only
12
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 Mini not benchmarked, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 15.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): o3 Mini 43.0% against Solar Pro 4 70.7%, 27.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 Mini $4.40 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 7.3x apart.
Context window
o3 Mini takes 200K tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3 MiniBarsSolar Pro 4Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
Aider polyglot60.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified42.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Lite32.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.7Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SciCode42.8%48.0%Solar Pro 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
GSO-Bench1.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
WeirdML43.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Cybench22.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
ALE-BenchNot measured179.3Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding13781438Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: software and IT13641431Solar Pro 4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1363Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.528.2Solar Pro 4
Epoch Capabilities Index140.2Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1105Only Solar Pro 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
GPQA Diamond75.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.3%89.1%Solar Pro 4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%29.8%Solar Pro 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
ARC-AGI34.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SimpleBench22.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Chess puzzles15.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13651400Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: expert13641428Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13751427Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
AIME86.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME76.9%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 318.6%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH level 596.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13961421Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: mathematical work13991427Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified15.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science13391404Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13301374Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: legal and government13281383Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: business and finance13131381Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1176Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1150Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1170Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1177Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1178Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1182Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
IFBench67.1%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.0%70.7%Solar Pro 4
DTBench68.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMCA19.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)61.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text13371388Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: instruction following13371375Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: creative writing12861317Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: English13511414Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: non-English13191363Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Chinese13791422Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: German13031358Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Japanese12861320Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Korean13131383Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: French13341400Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Spanish13211409Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Russian13041357Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Polish12941304Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201385Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: longer queries13431382Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: writing and language13131344Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12831332Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
Benchmarko3 MiniSolar Pro 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Solar Pro 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.068Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Solar Pro 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window
Solar Pro 4$0.036Fits in one request

Solar Pro 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 Mini and Solar Pro 4
SpecificationOpenAI o3 MiniUpstage Solar Pro 4
MakerOpenAIUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 31, 2025August 10, 2026
Context window200K524K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.15
Output $/Mtok$4.40$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 Mini better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 Mini for work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o3 Mini or Solar Pro 4?

o3 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 Mini or Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4, with 524K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 Mini vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o3 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next