o3 Mini vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
o3 Mini leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.5 to 11.2, and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 3.7x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.
o3 Mini or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick o3 Mini for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 29
- o3 Mini only
- 42
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
o3 Mini
o3 Mini leads, 12.5 against 11.2.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only o3 Mini has a GPQA Diamond result, 75.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only o3 Mini has a AIME result, 86.5%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only o3 Mini has a MMLU Pro result, 78.7%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking takes 262K tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
o3 Mini $0.0033, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- o3 Mini not benchmarked, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 7.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare: o3 Mini 1330 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 1392, 10.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- o3 Mini $4.40 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
- Context window
- o3 Mini takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | o3 Mini | Bars | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Math | 1 | 1 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 2 | 15 | ||
| All shared boards | 4 | 25 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 60.4% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | 42.4% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SWE-bench Lite | 32.3% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 17.4 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 71.5% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 73.4% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SciCode | 42.8% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.8% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| GSO-Bench | 1.3% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Cybench | 22.5% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1378 | 1392 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1364 | 1393 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| SciCode | 7.7% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 12.5 | 11.2 | o3 Mini |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.2 | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 31.3% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.5% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 77.3% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 12.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 77.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI | 34.5% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 3.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SimpleBench | 22.8% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Chess puzzles | 15.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 7.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1365 | 1371 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1364 | 1376 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1375 | 1384 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 86.5% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 91.8% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 91.3% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 76.9% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 18.6% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 0.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| MATH level 5 | 96.5% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1396 | 1399 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1399 | 1390 | o3 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 78.7% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 71.5% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 45.3% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 69.4% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 94.8% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.3% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1339 | 1384 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1330 | 1392 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1328 | 1364 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1313 | 1360 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index215
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 67.1% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 43.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| DTBench | 68.8% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMCA | 19.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 50.0% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 61.7% | Not measured | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text | 1337 | 1368 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1337 | 1344 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1286 | 1314 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: English | 1351 | 1392 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1319 | 1342 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1379 | 1407 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: German | 1303 | 1356 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1286 | 1280 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1313 | 1310 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: French | 1334 | 1351 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1321 | 1358 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1304 | 1337 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1294 | 1345 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1320 | 1346 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1343 | 1353 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1313 | 1330 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1283 | 1312 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI o3 Mini | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | January 31, 2025 | September 11, 2025 |
| Context window | 200K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.10 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.40 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is o3 Mini better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 Mini for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, o3 Mini or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
o3 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, o3 Mini or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the o3 Mini vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking comparison based on?
29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o3 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.