Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 Mini vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads o3 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.2 to 12.5, and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 4.4x less per output token ($1.00 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.

o3 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
38.0
Output $/M
$4.40
3
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
13
vs boards won of 16 shared

o3 Mini or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 Mini for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
16
o3 Mini only
55
Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
4
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 Mini not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 64.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: o3 Mini 31.3% against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 95.3%, 64.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 Mini $4.40 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
Context window
o3 Mini takes 200K tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3 MiniBarsQwen3.6 35B A3BTies
Coding21
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Math02
General13
All shared boards313
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Aider polyglot60.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified42.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Lite32.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured41.9Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SciCode42.8%36.6%o3 Mini
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%34.8%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
GSO-Bench1.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
WeirdML43.7%34.5%o3 Mini
Cybench22.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding1378Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1364Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.518.2Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Epoch Capabilities Index140.2143.7Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured13.1Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.3%95.3%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond75.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.3%84.1%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%22.2%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.0%84.8%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
ARC-AGI34.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SimpleBench22.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Chess puzzles15.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%22.0%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts1365Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1364Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1375Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AIME86.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME76.9%86.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 318.6%20.4%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH level 596.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1396Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1399Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified15.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1339Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1330Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1328Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1313Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
General benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBench67.1%64.4%o3 Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.0%71.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
DTBench68.8%73.9%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
LMCA19.0%29.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)61.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text1337Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1337Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1286Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1351Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1319Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1379Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1303Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1286Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1313Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1334Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1321Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1304Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1294Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1320Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1343Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1313Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1283Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.068Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 Mini and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationOpenAI o3 MiniQwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 31, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.10
Output $/Mtok$4.40$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 Mini better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 Mini for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o3 Mini or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

o3 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 Mini or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 Mini vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. o3 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next