Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 Mini vs Qwen3 30B A3B

o3 Mini leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.5 to 7.6, and Qwen3 30B A3B costs 8.8x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 45 benchmarks have a result for both.

o3 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
38.0
Output $/M
$4.40
40
Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
4
vs boards won of 45 shared, 1 tied

o3 Mini or Qwen3 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 Mini for a larger context window (200K against 41K tokens) and work measured by Creative writing (Lech Mazur) or LMArena Text: German, where it leads.

Shared results
45
o3 Mini only
26
Qwen3 30B A3B only
7
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 Mini not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 10.2 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): o3 Mini 43.0% against Qwen3 30B A3B 0.0%, 43.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 Mini $4.40 against Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 per million output tokens, 8.8x apart.
Context window
o3 Mini takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3 MiniBarsQwen3 30B A3BTies
Coding401 tie
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge50
General194
All shared boards4041 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
Aider polyglot60.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified42.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Lite32.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.4%50.6%o3 Mini
SciCode42.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%6.8%Tie
GSO-Bench1.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
WeirdML43.7%29.8%o3 Mini
Cybench22.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding13781337o3 Mini
LMArena Text: software and IT13641340o3 Mini
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.57.6o3 Mini
Epoch Capabilities Index140.2137.3o3 Mini
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom31.3%26.0%o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond75.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.3%61.6%o3 Mini
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%6.2%o3 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.0%61.7%o3 Mini
ARC-AGI34.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SimpleBench22.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Chess puzzles15.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13651314o3 Mini
LMArena Text: expert13641314o3 Mini
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13751329o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AIME86.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured72.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIME76.9%62.8%o3 Mini
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 318.6%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH level 596.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13961355o3 Mini
LMArena Text: mathematical work13991363o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%77.7%o3 Mini
SimpleQA Verified15.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science13391321o3 Mini
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13301318o3 Mini
LMArena Text: legal and government13281314o3 Mini
LMArena Text: business and finance13131309o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured955Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured946Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured899Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured967Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured942Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index194
General benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
IFBench67.1%41.5%o3 Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.0%0.0%o3 Mini
DTBench68.8%60.3%o3 Mini
LMCA19.0%15.8%o3 Mini
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%40.6%o3 Mini
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)61.7%75.3%Qwen3 30B A3B
LMArena Text13371317o3 Mini
LMArena Text: instruction following13371283o3 Mini
LMArena Text: creative writing12861271o3 Mini
LMArena Text: English13511335o3 Mini
LMArena Text: non-English13191295o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Chinese13791347o3 Mini
LMArena Text: German13031307Qwen3 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Japanese12861254o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Korean13131261o3 Mini
LMArena Text: French13341352Qwen3 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Spanish13211317o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Russian13041291o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Polish12941299Qwen3 30B A3B
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201307o3 Mini
LMArena Text: longer queries13431312o3 Mini
LMArena Text: writing and language13131290o3 Mini
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12831258o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.068Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B
SpecificationOpenAI o3 MiniQwen3 30B A3B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 31, 2025April 28, 2025
Context window200K41K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.12
Output $/Mtok$4.40$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 Mini better than Qwen3 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 Mini for a larger context window (200K against 41K tokens) and work measured by Creative writing (Lech Mazur) or LMArena Text: German, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o3 Mini or Qwen3 30B A3B?

o3 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 Mini or Qwen3 30B A3B?

o3 Mini, with 200K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 Mini vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o3 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next