Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 Mini vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads o3 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 12.5, and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 1.3x less per output token ($3.50 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

o3 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
38.0
Output $/M
$4.40
1
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
36
vs boards won of 37 shared

o3 Mini or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 Mini for a larger context window (200K against 128K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
37
o3 Mini only
34
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 Mini not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 18.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SimpleQA Verified: o3 Mini 15.3% against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 40.4%, 25.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 Mini $4.40 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
o3 Mini takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3 MiniBarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding12
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math03
Knowledge05
General020
All shared boards136
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Aider polyglot60.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified42.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench Lite32.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.1Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SciCode42.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
GSO-Bench1.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
WeirdML43.7%41.0%o3 Mini
Cybench22.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding13781424Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT13641431Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.512.7Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index140.2Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond75.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.0%80.1%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
ARC-AGI34.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SimpleBench22.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Chess puzzles15.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%9.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts13651416Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: expert13641463Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13751432Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AIME86.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME76.9%86.7%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 318.6%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MATH level 596.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13961412Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: mathematical work13991435Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified15.3%40.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: science13391433Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13301456Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government13281415Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance13131413Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1052Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured942Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured956Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured997Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1032Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
IFBench67.1%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.0%Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
DTBench68.8%80.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMCA19.0%29.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%75.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)61.7%82.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text13371415Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following13371386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing12861384Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: English13511429Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: non-English13191397Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese13791481Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: German13031408Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese12861386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Korean13131375Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: French1334Not measuredOnly o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish13211389Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Russian13041401Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Polish12941390Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201406Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: longer queries13431400Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language13131388Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12831370Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Benchmarko3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.068Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 Mini and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationOpenAI o3 MiniQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 31, 2025July 25, 2025
Context window200K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.45
Output $/Mtok$4.40$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 Mini better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 Mini for a larger context window (200K against 128K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o3 Mini or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

o3 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 Mini or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

o3 Mini, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 Mini vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. o3 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next