Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B leads Nemotron 3 Ultra on coding, 36.8 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($2.70 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.
Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick
Pick Qwen3.6 27B for coding: it scores 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra, though on 2 benchmarks against 3.
Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.40 vs $2.70 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 20
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 51
- Qwen3.6 27B only
- 5
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B scores 36.8 against 30.0.
3 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Nemotron 3 Ultra
Nemotron 3 Ultra leads, 22.9 against 21.4.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Nemotron 3 Ultra
Nemotron 3 Ultra leads, 20.1 against 18.5.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a GPQA Diamond result, 86.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a MMLU Pro result, 85.8%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a Design Arena: websites result, 1145.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 262K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
No call
Nemotron 3 Ultra $0.0018, Qwen3.6 27B $0.0018 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.6 27B has the number, $1.30.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- General, 7.5 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- IFBench: Nemotron 3 Ultra 81.4% against Qwen3.6 27B 67.6%, 13.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 262K tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Bars | Qwen3.6 27B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 4 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 1 | ||
| Math | 0 | 1 | ||
| Knowledge | 2 | 0 | ||
| General | 4 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 12 | 8 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 49.3 | 53.7 | Qwen3.6 27B |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 69.0% | 70.0% | Qwen3.6 27B |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 7.6% | 11.9% | Qwen3.6 27B |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 4.9% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 50.9% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| SciCode | 40.3% | 42.8% | Qwen3.6 27B |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 36.4% | 34.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| FrontierCode | 13.6% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| WeirdML | 43.5% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1468 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1468 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.9 | 21.4 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.0 | 146.2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 20.1 | 18.5 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 37.7% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 15.4% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 31.7% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 83.3% | 94.2% | Qwen3.6 27B |
| APEX-Agents | 22.7% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| MCP Atlas | 63.1% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.1% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.7% | 84.2% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.4% | 23.1% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 85.4% | 85.9% | Qwen3.6 27B |
| Mystery game puzzles | 20.0% | 7.0% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1452 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1472 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1453 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 86.7% | 91.1% | Qwen3.6 27B |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 35.1% | Only Qwen3.6 27B measured |
| ProofBench | 2.0% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1457 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1461 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 85.8% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.1% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.2% | Only Qwen3.6 27B measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.5% | 62.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.1% | 71.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.3% | Only Qwen3.6 27B measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 38.6% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1465 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1456 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1452 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1434 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1145 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1135 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1138 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1141 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1131 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1146 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1069 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1100 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.6% | Only Qwen3.6 27B measured |
| IFBench | 81.4% | 67.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.3% | 77.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| DTBench | 90.1% | 78.1% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| LMCA | 36.9% | 34.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
| LMArena Text | 1445 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1418 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1399 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1455 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1427 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1497 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1472 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1384 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1472 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1455 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1417 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1385 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1411 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1437 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1406 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1397 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured |
| EQ-Bench 4 | Not measured | 1026 | Only Qwen3.6 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Same cost
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.6 27B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.6 27B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | NVIDIA | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | June 4, 2026 | April 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.60 | $0.45 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.40 | $2.70 |
| Coding index | 30.0 | 36.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.30 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nemotron 3 Ultra better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?
Pick Qwen3.6 27B for coding: it scores 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra, though on 2 benchmarks against 3. Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.40 vs $2.70 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.6 27B?
Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.6 27B only.
Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.6 27B?
Neither: both take 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?
20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Ultra's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.