Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.2 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.8x less per output token ($0.45 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
0
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.28 per million).

Shared results
36
Nemotron 3 Super only
3
Qwen3.7 Plus only
39
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 20.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nemotron 3 Super 67.8% against Qwen3.7 Plus 93.0%, 25.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 2.8x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3 Super takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 SuperBarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Coding Index37.755.9Qwen3.7 Plus
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode36.2%46.1%Qwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%47.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
WeirdML38.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-Bench213.9Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: coding14031473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14091473Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.825.2Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.0Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index1.717.5Qwen3.7 Plus
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured49.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom67.8%93.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.0%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.8%35.6%Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13861460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert13981466Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13971460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1292Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math13801467Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14051470Qwen3.7 Plus
MathArena16.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science13871464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13831464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government13921451Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance13641435Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1258Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1262Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1277Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1238Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1268Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1207Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1143Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench71.5%78.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%73.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
DTBenchNot measured84.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text13781454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following13471439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing13171438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English14001458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English13561445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese14311509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German13411471Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1412Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1413Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: French14031472Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14181457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian13361457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish13461449Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: multi-turn13691459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries13621454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language13321437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13361422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1332Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1288Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1258Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 SuperQwen3.7 Plus
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 11, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.085$0.32
Output $/Mtok$0.45$1.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked33.2
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next