Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.9 to 7.6, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 3.4x less per output token ($0.147 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
Coding
22.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.147
4
Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3 30B A3B: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
4
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only
16
Qwen3 30B A3B only
48
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 22.6 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 60.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 60.3% against Qwen3 30B A3B 0.0%, 60.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.147 against Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 per million output tokens, 3.4x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning takes 262K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 LightningBarsQwen3 30B A3BTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards40
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding Index26.8Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Code migration (Vals AI)3.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)10.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)29.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
SciCode32.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
WeirdMLNot measured29.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
ALE-Bench769.2Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1337Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1340Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.97.6Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured137.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index3.5Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)18.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)2.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)17.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.3%61.6%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%6.2%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured61.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1329Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured72.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1355Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1363Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1321Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1318Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1309Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured954Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured943Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured898Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured967Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured941Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
IFBenchNot measured41.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)60.3%0.0%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
DTBenchNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMCANot measured15.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured40.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1283Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1271Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1335Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1295Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1347Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1307Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1254Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1261Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1352Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1291Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1299Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1307Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1312Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1290Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1258Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0031Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.012Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3 30B A3B
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 30B A3B
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 11, 2026April 28, 2025
Context window262K41K
Input $/Mtok$0.0534$0.12
Output $/Mtok$0.147$0.50
Coding index22.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.06Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than Qwen3 30B A3B for coding?

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.0534 per million input tokens and $0.147 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, with 262K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next