Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs o4 Mini

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs 22.0x less per output token than o4 Mini ($0.20 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
43.0
Output $/M
$4.40
vs $0.20 vs $4.40 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 22.0x cheaper.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or o4 Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for output tokens 22.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $4.40 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet; o4 Mini on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Multimodal. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety not benchmarked, o4 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety $0.20 against o4 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 22.0x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety takes 131K tokens, o4 Mini 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured72.0%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured64.6%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured33.9%Only o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only o4 Mini measured
GSO-BenchNot measured3.6%Only o4 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1368Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1367Only o4 Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured10.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured16.7Only o4 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured145.5Only o4 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured55.6%Only o4 Mini measured
METR time horizonsNot measured63.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured53.2%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured74.5%Only o4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.4%Only o4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured16.5%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured79.6%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured58.7%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured6.1%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleBenchNot measured38.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only o4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured5.0%Only o4 Mini measured
VPCTNot measured57.5%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1351Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1343Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1366Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1197Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1234Only o4 Mini measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured67.6%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured83.7%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.2%Only o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured93.4%Only o4 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured90.7Only o4 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.7%Only o4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured81.7%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured36.1%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1389Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1379Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured80.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only o4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only o4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.0%Only o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.2%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.6%Only o4 Mini measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1354Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1361Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1350Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1325Only o4 Mini measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured28.1%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured985Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured983Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1003Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured991Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured854Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured976Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content Safetyo4 MiniLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only o4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured69.1%Only o4 Mini measured
IFBenchNot measured68.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured61.0%Only o4 Mini measured
DTBenchNot measured77.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMCANot measured26.5%Only o4 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured77.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1353Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1320Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1294Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1194Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1367Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1337Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1354Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1336Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1308Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1312Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1364Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1346Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1334Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1358Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1350Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1315Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1316Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1308Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1200Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1218Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1197Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1199Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1204Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1218Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1166Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.0003Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.011Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.042Exceeds the context window
o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyOpenAI o4 Mini
MakerNVIDIAOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 4, 2026April 16, 2025
Context window131K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$1.10
Output $/Mtok$0.20$4.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety better than o4 Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for output tokens 22.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $4.40 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or o4 Mini?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; o4 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or o4 Mini?

o4 Mini, with 200K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and o4 Mini?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet; o4 Mini on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Multimodal. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next